Stephen Feneley, outspoken former ABC arts reporter, slams the legacy of former editor Michael Gawenda.
I am not an Age insider, just a very bored and angry punter who, over eight years living in Melbourne, has watched the slow death of a once great newspaper. Under Gawenda, The Age seemed to go out of its way to send its readers to sleep. Jaspan has only been in the job a short time but already it is possible to see some sign of life coming back into the paper.
With the very odd exception, Gawenda seemed to have his reporters under a riding instruction to NOT break stories. Leaving aside the assault on the head of ATSIC, it is hard to remember a time when The Age under Gawenda ever campaigned on anything. The Age began to resemble its editor-in-chief – grey, smug and dull.
At least now we are seeing some signs of fire in the journos’ bellies – even if their campaigning thus far is only about cleaning up a river which, from the point of view of an ex Sydneysider, was never anything more than a glorified creek.
The paper now looks a little more energetic, it looks like the people who put it together are beginning to enjoy themselves, a bit. The Age under Gawenda looked like something some old Soviet hacks might have produced, driven by an overwhelming desire not to offend anybody, except uppity blackfellas.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.