There’s been some sniping from
the media-spindustrial complex over yesterday’s Newspoll – and all the
sneering at last week’s AC Nielsen survey that put the ALP in front.
Nielsen called last year’s election result the closest, say its
spruikers.
Meanwhile, a subscriber has been wiling away in a slow week with their spreadsheets, playing with the polling:
“Beazley
has miles to go, as you say. But, equally, those who place undue
emphasis on the fact that ALP primary votes are as bad as, or worse
than, they were at the election are making too much of that too. It
always happens. The winner always draws farther away in the early
months of a new term. That it may have happened now (Nielsen says the
opposite, actually) is entirely unremarkable, especially given the
almost unprecedented mess the ALP was in from October to mid-January.”
They’ve produced this table, using Newspoll figures:
Primary votes at and after Federal elections 1993-2005
Election | Winner’s margin | 3-4 months later | Early gain for winner |
1993 | 0.5% | 9% | 8.5% |
1996 | 8.3% | 19% | 10.7% |
1998 | 0.6% | 9% | 9.6% |
2001 | 5.3% | 9% | 3.7% |
2004 | 8.9% | 11% | 2.1% |
“You
are right: opinion polls are meaningless for most of the electoral
cycle, especially in its early stages,” they say. Still, that last line
of the table should give Howard something to think about. Heck, it
might even scare him into tackling tax reform.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.