I read with interest today Hugo Kelly’s comments about my housing situation. I do
not remember Mr Kelly ever approaching me about this or any other
matter.
Linking it
to the pay rise is a long shot – I first learned of this decision when I read my Canberra Times
this morning. The Remuneration Tribunal makes a recommendation which is then adopted by
the Government without the Assembly playing any role. This is
inappropriate.
As for my
housing, it is ACT Government policy that tenants have security of tenure.
Indeed, me leaving my house will do less for the needy people Mr Kelly probably has in mind
than staying in it. Paradoxical I know, but the 13% of tenants who pay market
rent contribute $19 million towards housing. Attacking me for paying market rent
on my home a few months after election, and then linking it to a
pay
rise I do not support, is really an attack on
the Government’s policy of secure housing
for all public housing tenants.
At the
moment my rent goes into building, purchasing and maintaining more homes for
people who need them. Under the Liberals’ policy, it would go to
a private
landlord and do nothing for affordable housing.
We need
more public and other affordable housing – there is no other way we can tackle the
problem.
Best
wishes
Deb
Foskey
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.