Former prime minister Paul Keating lobbed an unsolicited op-ed piece in to The Australian, The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald
late yesterday afternoon – and by this morning several hundred thousand
Australians were finally alerted to the threat to democracy posed by
the federal government’s proposed changes to media regulation.
As Keating wrote in his story:
- “The Government’s apparent decision to close down any option
for new free-to-air television outlets or multiple channels while
removing the existing cross-media laws and foreign ownership
restrictions is a recipe for massive media concentration and further
abuses of power by the existing network owners.”- “Such a change would see the potential for the greatest and
most unseemly concentration of media in Australia’s history. And if
people think they have seen exercises in media power already, it will
be as nothing like it may be should these two corporations have their
way unfettered.”- “The simple point is that John Howard does not have to do this.
The pressure for this comes only from Publishing and Broadcasting, News
Limited and the loitering Fairfax.”- “Proposed policy changes of this kind are always sold on phoney
arguments and an almighty sleight of hand. The phoney argument goes to
how digital convergence is changing traditional media and
communications and how in the technical determinism of it, as night
follows day, traditional print and television companies ought be
permitted to merge.”- “Nobody should be seeking obscurantist curbs on the
proliferation of communication channels and media whether of the
Blackberry variety or more cable channels. But there is a cut and dried
case with nought to do with convergence in respect of the big
traditional print and TV outlets.”- “What is proposed is a bit of dirty home-town play for the
principal benefit of the major incumbents. In practice, were these
changes to come about, ordinary bods would need the Packer and Murdoch
organisations to stamp their passports for their free movement through
Australian society. Not as dire as in the days of the Völkischer Beobachter but heading in that direction.”
CRIKEY: Let the debate and the opposition begin – for the sake of Australian democracy.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.