“It’s almost like watching a ballgame played without the ball,” Janet Maslin said.
The former New York Times film critic was reflecting on the burgeoning buzz around the Academy Awards, in a year of distinctly unbuzzy competition.
Amid the modest, tasteful contenders, there is no Titanic—let alone a Dances with Wolves—to provoke fisticuffs about art versus commerce.
But
that doesn’t stop the commerce. “The big pile of cash that’s still
using a lot of newspaper advertising is Hollywood,” said one
ad-industry observer. “And that’s why they’re going like crazy to it.”
And
the press, in turn, is creating a hospitable editorial environment for
the movie ads—reserving space in print and on the Web for writing about
the Academy Awards, whether there’s anything worth saying or not.
https://www.observer.com/20060227/20060227_Tom_Scocca_pageone_coverstory1.asp
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.