IOOF censors The AFR
By Stephen Mayne Re the story that appeared in the AFR about the suspected irregularities at IOOF last week (which was reported in Crikey). Apparently all the AFR’s delivered to IOOF with the “offending” story were “doctored” before staff received the paper. The page with the “offending” article was removed. Censorship 2006 style????
article-article-body
By Stephen Mayne
Re the story that appeared in the AFR about the suspected irregularities at IOOF last week (which was reported in Crikey). Apparently all the AFR’s delivered to IOOF with the “offending” story were “doctored” before staff received the paper. The page with the “offending” article was removed. Censorship 2006 style????
About the Author
Crikey
Publication
Crikey is Australia's leading independent source of news, investigations, analysis and opinion.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.