-
The liquid threat: Since September 2001, the [US] government
has hired tens of thousands of government screeners and upgraded its
metal detectors and X-ray machines. But most of the equipment is still
oriented toward preventing a metallic gun or other easily identifiable
weapon from being carried aboard; it cannot distinguish shampoo from an
explosive … Most liquid explosives would require a detonator, but a
music player or other hand-held passenger gadget has sufficient
electrical energy to do that, according to experts. – New York Times -
The threat from within:
Good relations between the police and Muslim communities are not a
pleasant side-show in the fight against terrorism. Initial indications
suggest that some or all of those arrested today – like the 7/7 bombers
– are British nationals, living within and among ordinary, law abiding
Muslim communities. We cannot hope to be successful in what could be a
long and drawn out campaign unless those communities trust the police
and have confidence in their ability to work alongside them in
precisely the type of partnership that [British Home Secretary] John
Reid has signalled he wants. – Rachel Briggs, Comment is Free -
The al-Qaeda threat: An alleged terror plot to blow up
several transatlantic passenger jets … would have caused even greater
casualties than 9/11, officials and experts say, marking a chilling
departure from smaller-scale terror attacks of recent years … Experts
say that the foiled attack suggests al-Qaeda involvement. Aviation is
still a favoured target for al-Qaeda acolytes bent on taking terrorism
to new heights. – Christian Science Monitor -
American reaction: America’s security alert on aircraft
from Britain was raised to its highest level for the first time
yesterday – a month before the fifth anniversary of 9/11 … Even if
the country has reached the point at which the events of 9/11 are
deemed suitable fare for a Hollywood movie – Oliver Stone’s film World Trade Centre
opened this week – a sense of vulnerability remains. Indeed, polls by
the Pew Research Centre show 80% in the US believe it “likely” or
“fairly likely” that another major terrorist attack will hit them. – The Independent -
The sceptics: There’s a familiar ritual each time an
operation to thwart a putative terrorist incident dominates the news.
After the public’s initial expressions of relief and shuddering
contemplation of what might have been, a rising chorus of sceptics
takes over, with a string of questions and hypotheses. Was it really a
serious terrorist plot, or only a bunch of misguided, alienated Muslim
kids larking about with a chemistry set and a mobile phone? Sometimes,
unfortunately, as with this summer’s ludicrously overplayed Miami
“plot” to blow up buildings in Chicago, in which the plotters had got
as far as purchasing some boots but not much else, overzealous
authorities bring this sort of suspicion on themselves. But you can
guarantee that every incident now, whatever the evidence, will be
treated with such derisive doubt. If the police had got to the 9/11
hijackers or the 7/7 bombers in time, a sizeable chunk of respectable
opinion would have dismissed them as idealistic young men with no real
capacity or intent to cause harm. – Gerard Baker, The Times -
The media’s role: [British Home Secretary] John Reid presumably knew about the plot to blow thousands of British holidaymakers out of the sky when he warned yesterday
that we face the biggest security threat since the Second World War. At
5am this morning, the home secretary was chairing Cobra, the committee
which convenes immediately a major incident is under way. It is named
prosaically after the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms
in which senior officials will now be gathered in more or less
permanent session, while ministers dip in and out. Its role is to
gather and assess information, and to co-ordinate action. I have taken
part during hostage crises abroad, plugging into the intelligence and
other material coming in from the security services, diplomatic
missions overseas (by video link) and other sources of information. It
is vital that ministers and their media advisors know in these
circumstances precisely what is happening, or thought to be happening,
because at times like this the media becomes the major instrument of
public reassurance. – John Williams, Comment is Free -
Airline woes:
British Airways
has been particularly hard hit by the latest security scare. Heathrow
is BA’s hub and it is Heathrow, one of the world’s busiest airports,
that has suffered the most disruption … For BA, the present security
threat will mark yet another troubled summer. But today’s events are a
blow to the whole airline sector, not just BA. Even after this security
scare passes, the TV pictures of thousands of people stuck at airports,
having to go back home, and the stepped-up security measures – not even
bottled water was allowed on board because of the fear of liquid
explosives – could well make people think twice about air travel in the
future, especially during August. – Guardian newsblog -
Stockmarket impact: While airlines and travel companies
were dealt a sharp blow Thursday by the discovery of a terrorist plot
aimed at trans-Atlantic flights, shares of companies that make
surveillance and detection technologies were boosted by prospects of
increased spending on security. – New York Times -
The future: Can technology create a non-hijackable
plane? By 2008, European researchers aim to bring that vision closer to
reality through an ambitious security program to combat on-board
threats in an industry left reeling this week by a security scare that
raised the spectre of September 11 … Among the non-hijackable plane’s
features: computer systems designed to spot suspicious passenger
behaviour, and a collision avoidance system that will correct the
plane’s trajectory to prevent it from being steered into a building or
mountain. – Daily Mirror
What the media are saying about the terror plot
The liquid threat: Since September 2001, the [US] government has hired tens of thousands of government screeners and upgraded its metal detectors and X-ray machines. But most of the equipment is still oriented toward preventing a metallic gun or other easily identifiable weapon from being carried aboard; it cannot distinguish shampoo from an explosive … […]
article-article-body
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.