According to Treasurer Peter Costello at the weekend, demonstrators at the G20 forum in Melbourne were “throwing balloons filled with urine at police”. So who were these people? Were they caught on camera? Were they arrested? With a heavy media presence and every other person wielding a camera, why does no snapshot or witness of these urine-throwing thugs exist?
So in search of the urine-bombers, we went to the police themselves. This morning police media spokesperson told Crikey: “We’re not aware of any specific incidents of urine-throwing.”
Where, then, did the Treasurer get his information? Costello said the urine-throwers at G20 were “a hardcore militant and violent” group “organised for violence, who have been trained for violence.” If the Federal Treasurer knew of an “organised … militant” group “trained” for “violence”, why hasn’t it been charged under terror laws?
Or was the Treasurer fantasising? “Urine-filled balloons are to contemporary protests what bayoneted babies were to the First World War,” says Radical Melbourne author Jeff Sparrow. “The ‘urine-filled-balloons’ fantasy seems to have originated after a protest against Pauline Hanson, at which people tossed water bombs at Nazi skinheads going into her rally. Some of the balloons had been filled from a hot water tap… thus sparking the first report of flung urine.”
“Thereafter, it became a staple of demo journalism. Without fail, each time a protest caused controversy the urine balloons (or condoms) would appear. Of course, if you think about it for a minute, the whole idea is ridiculous. I mean, how do you fill a balloon full of urine — drink a lot of coffee and beer, and then attach a balloon to the relevant appendage, in the middle of a crowd?”
It’s possible the Federal Treasurer, like the Australian and Herald-Sun reports, confused persistent fables of urine-throwers with actual G20 “demonstrators” who threw street signs and smashed a police vehicle for television cameras. Reportedly unknown to protest organisers, the group’s tactics have been condemned by moderate demonstrators, with eleven reported arrests.
But why, in the Federal Treasurer’s mind, were there ”no reported arrests” of those unshakable urine-grenaders who, like vampires, never appear on camera? The Treasurer’s office was contacted, but didn’t provide a response in time for this article.
In search of the elusive G20 urine bombers
Who are these people always throwing urine-filled balloons or condoms at police, without being caught on camera or arrested? With a heavy media presence and every other person wielding a camera at protests these days, why does no witness of these piss-throwing thugs exist?
article-article-body
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.