Of the many Budgets I have looked at, I have always wondered why the media perception frequently looks so different to the numbers. I have seen social security Budgets presented as defence Budgets. I have seen defence Budgets presented as health Budgets. And last night, after Peter Costello presented his twelfth Budget, and all the world agrees that it was an education budget.
However, when I look at the numbers, it looks to me like the major beneficiary is defence first, health second and education only third.
In Table 1, we show the composition of the outlays of this Budget. The Government should manage to spend some $235.6 billion in the year ahead. The biggest sections of this spending remain Social Security and Health. Some $96.45 billion should be spent in social security and welfare or some 40.9% of the Budget. Health spending should consume some $42.9 billion or 18.2% of the Budget. Defence should consume $19.9 billion or 8.4% of the Budget and Education should consume $17.8 billion or 7.5% of the Budget.
Table 1: Estimates of Australian general government expenses by function
|
Function |
2007-08 AUD |
$m % of Total Expenses |
|
Social Security and Welfare* |
96,450 |
40.94% |
|
Health* |
42,964 |
18.24% |
|
Defence |
19,880 |
8.44% |
|
Education |
17,752 |
7.54% |
|
General Public Services |
15,768 |
6.69% |
|
Other Purposes |
12,794 |
5.43% |
|
Other Economic Affairs |
5,617 |
2.38% |
|
Fuel and Energy |
5,360 |
2.28% |
|
Transport and Communication |
4,516 |
1.92% |
|
Public Order and Safety |
3,670 |
1.56% |
|
Housing and Community Amenities |
3,011 |
1.28% |
|
Recreation and Culture |
2,979 |
1.26% |
|
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing |
2,799 |
1.19% |
|
Mining, Manufacturing and Construction |
2,029 |
0.86% |
|
Total Expenses |
235,590 |
100% |
* There has been a reclassification of some expenditure administered by the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs that was previously reported under the health assistance to the aged sub-function (health) to the assistance to the aged sub-function (social security and welfare). Source: Budget Paper No.1 2007/2008
In my opening remarks, I suggested that defence was a greater beneficiary in this Budget than education. We can see why I said that by looking at Table 2. In Table 2 we show the budgeted numbers for 2007-2008 compared to the budgeted numbers for the same Government functions in 2006-2008. In Table 2 we can see that defence spending increases by $2 billion from $17.8 billion in 2006-7 to $19.8 billion in 2007-8. This is an increase of 11.2% in nominal terms and an increase of 8.7% in real terms. This compares to increased education spending between the two budgets of $1.1 billion. This represents a nominal increase of 6.7% and a real increase of 4.2%.
Table 2: Estimates of Australian general government expenses by function
|
Function |
2006-07 AUD $m |
2007-08 AUD $m |
Dollar Increase |
% |
% Real Increase |
|
Social Security and Welfare* |
91,756 |
96,450 |
4,694 |
5.12% |
2.62% |
|
Health* |
39,838 |
42,964 |
3,126 |
7.85% |
5.35% |
|
Defence |
17,871 |
19,880 |
2,009 |
11.24% |
8.74% |
|
Education |
16,633 |
17,752 |
1,119 |
6.73% |
4.23% |
|
General Public Services |
13,809 |
15,768 |
1,959 |
14.19% |
11.69% |
|
Other Purposes |
12,761 |
12,794 |
33 |
0.26% |
-2.24% |
|
Other Economic Affairs |
5,618 |
5,617 |
-1 |
-0.02% |
-2.52% |
|
Fuel and Energy |
4,804 |
5,360 |
556 |
11.57% |
9.07% |
|
Transport and Communication |
3,552 |
4,516 |
964 |
27.14% |
24.64% |
|
Public Order and Safety |
3,286 |
3,670 |
384 |
11.69% |
9.19% |
|
Housing and Community Amenities |
2,790 |
3,011 |
221 |
7.92% |
5.42% |
|
Recreation and Culture |
2,627 |
2,979 |
352 |
13.40% |
10.90% |
|
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing |
2,300 |
2,799 |
499 |
21.70% |
19.20% |
|
Mining, Manufacturing and Construction |
2,085 |
2,029 |
-56 |
-2.69% |
-5.19% |
|
Total Expenses |
219,730 |
235,590 |
15,860 |
7.22% |
4.72% |
* There has been a reclassification of some expenditure administered by the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs that was previously reported under the health assistance to the aged sub-function (health) to the assistance to the aged sub-function (social security and welfare). Source: Budget Paper No.1 2007/2008
As can be seen above, in percentage and absolute terms, there are bigger increases in defence spending and in health spending than there is in education. Still, the education achieves a substantial growth.
So, will this wizardry allow the Treasurer to resist the approaches of the Boy Wizard of the North? For the answer to that, we will have to wait until the last chapter is published at the end of the year.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.