Does John Howard have one last scare campaign in him? Rising interest rates killed off any chance Paul Keating had for re-election in 1996. Taking over from the hapless Alexander Downer early in 1995, Howard lamented that “five minutes of economic sunlight” was all that voters had enjoyed since the recession.
Now, the Reserve Bank has as good as destroyed the Coalition’s chosen election slogan “Go For Growth”. This is a mere inconvenience for a campaign veteran such as Howard. In a radio interview this morning, Howard – unprompted – threw rising oil prices into the inflation equation. Responding to yesterday’s rates rise, government strategists released advertisements eerily similar to those from 2004 outlining how high interest rates have been under Labor governments.
Labor failed to push back on economic issues then, but have already shown sterner stuff this time. During the leaders’ debate, Rudd taunted Howard with the high inflation, unemployment and interest rates of his time as Malcolm Fraser’s treasurer. A fine rhetorical point, but well beyond the memory of anyone currently servicing a mortgage.
Things are always worse under Labor, Howard maintains. Only the coalition believes in budget surpluses. Yet, as Peter Costello told my John Winston Howard co-author, Peter van Onselen and I, Howard never misses an opportunity to spend his way out of political trouble. We have budget surpluses despite John Howard, not because of him. Nevertheless the budget surpluses – just like the interest rate rises – are a political fact of life.
Labor’s me-too strategy on tax cuts has caused them to forfeit the high ground on fiscal policy. Latham went out of his way in 2004 to show that his spending promises were more responsible than the government’s, but got no credit for it. The message to voters from the media, as it is again this time around, was that both sides were over-promising. The best way to play to its own strengths would be for Labor to put substance behind its ‘Education Revolution’ rhetoric. In the leaders’ debate, Rudd did well in linking education to the economy.
It takes a few billion dollars to raise a headline these days but it is vital for Labor to move the campaign agenda on from interest rates to education before Howard moves it on from interest rates to economic management.
Tony, “helping Iraquis build demacracy”????? The Yanks are there 1)so Dubbya could get back at Saddam;2)to feed a massive USA war machine and its parasites (eg Chaney’s Haliburton); 3) did anyone mention oil; and 4) so USA can maintain military presence.
Does that include Iraqis killed by Saddam? Should USA & Aust et all withdraw from Afghanistan? Did anyone complain about USA in Japan, Germany, Korea etc for decades? Should we desert East Timor? Why is helping Iraqis build democracy so objectionable?
5 mins of economic sunshine thanks to Keating’s IR laws: enterprise bargaining with union control. Rudd wants to bring it back. 1970s – Whitlam’s mess sustained by Hawke/unions -Xmas ariline shutdowns, wage blowouts, inflation & interest rates up. Scarey.
David, all those red herrings can be readily fulfilled without Iraq. Why is pursuit of democracy in Iraq so objectionable? US forces have been stationed in Mid East for decades? What are people trying to build in Pakistan, East Timor, ex-Yugoslaiva etc?
Hey Tony, you seem to be relentless about reminding everyone how bad it was since day dot and how awesome it has been under Howard. Let me ask you, how do you think 1 million dead iraqis are feeling about our economic well-being? You idiot…