Tony Abbott “reckons” he was taken out of “context” when he said that if you didn’t like your job you should just “stuff it”. Which doesn’t seem to “stack up”, given that what has been reported was what he said, give or take a “pair” or “two” of daggy finger-signed “inverted commas”.
If punctuation can form a saving “context” for an otherwise awkward statement, then the technique is bound to catch on. John Howard can claim that he only even meant to ignore “climate change”. Kevin Rudd will denounce “trade unions”. We need never again worry about “Bronwyn Bishop”. Julia Gillard wears “pants”. Maybe if the Liberals lose next week they can claim that all Rudd has is a “majority”, so why “worry”. Hmm. Just might “work”.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.