It’s a long, cold winter in Canberra, and even though they turned the heating up in the Press Gallery last week, there’s little to keep hacks warm as they shiver, stamp their feet and wonder about when Spring — and the Spring sitting of Parliament — will come.
Naturally, talk turns to leadership. And thus, yesterday, would Brendan Nelson stand aside for Peter Costello? Well, of course he technically “refused to rule it out”, but for that matter he also refused to rule out flying to the moon. Like any leader worth his salt, he was having none of it. Nelson’s not much of a leader, but he’s not dopey enough to hang a “Free To Good Home” sign on his position.
As so often happens, however, Nelson’s word choice was unfortunate. The “bullet” with which Costello would return to the frontbench if he decided to remain in politics was presumably of the sort that used to accompany songs on the Top 40 charts, rather than of the lethal projectile variety.
The latter type of bullet would, of course, be needed for whomever Costello replaced on the frontbench, but I can’t really see the erstwhile Next Prime Minister of Australia doing time, say, as Aged Care spokesman, or offering the Opposition’s views on education issues. For one thing, the ribbing he’d cop from Labor MPs whenever he went to the Dispatch Box in Question Time would be merciless.
The immediate prompt for this renewed bout of media speculation is a few paras in Inside Kevin 07 by Christine Jackman (or, to give her her full name, Christine Jackman, Senior Writer For The Australian) which indicated that, had John Howard fallen on his cricket bat during his last term and made way for Peter Costello, it would have nullified the ALP’s key theme of new, younger leadership. This statement of the painfully obvious has given new hope to those — mainly in the more moderate sections of the Liberal Party and the press — who spent most of the past decade projecting their hopes onto Costello.
This was always one of the few positives Costello had in his favour — by hinting faintly that he was more moderate than Howard, he could hope to attract support from party progressives, without ever really showing his true colours. Those colours are still hidden, even after all this time. I remain struck by a recent observation from a senior Liberal that, despite knowing the man for decades, he still didn’t feel like he knew who Costello really was.
What Costello definitely was, however, was Treasurer for the entirety of the Howard era, and accordingly widely disliked by the electorate. Remember the Howard-Rudd debate? When Howard talked about his fantastic and experienced team, and mentioned Costello, the worm went down like it had been shot. That about summed up Australians’ view of Costello, especially after Howard formalised the handover deal with that bizarre and damaging agreement before the election.
Worse, Costello has really ramped up the Hamlet act since then. It was bad enough that he never made a leadership bid against Howard, even after declaring he would while p-ssed with journalists one night, but at least he could argue he knew he couldn’t win. But then he knocked the job back after the election. Most voters, even those who don’t pay any attention to politics, will have sensed his uncertainty. Does he want to be leader or not? If so, why would he let Nelson take eight months of sh-t and humiliation before stepping in?
What, in short, is his problem?
For all the talk that the prospect of a Prime Minister Costello was the stuff of Labor nightmares before November, Kevin Rudd and his team are unlikely to be losing any sleep over the ascension of Costello — finally — to the Liberal leadership.
In any event, it’s all media speculation feeding off itself. Costello will leave politics, just like he said after the election. His only goal at the moment is his book. Which, incidentally, is getting marvellous publicity from all this speculation. And all without Costello even opening his mouth.
The less you say, the more people can project onto you, and when you say nothing at all, they can project whatever they like.
I think the ultimate issue for Peter Costello is that he didn’t ever want to contest the leadership. He wants (as did Howard) to have the leadership handed to him as his due.
Peter wants to be seen as the white knight riding to the rescue of the party in a time of crisis.
Fighting for it would make him seem less than that. It would make him just another politician.
He is waiting for Nelson to fail and then for the party to recognise that they were wrong not to have killed JWH and installed him before the last election and to atone by killing Nelson and annointing him.
No contest, no heckling, no public agitating. He wants to be begged to save them.
I think he will be wanting for an awfully long time.
Isn’t it time for Peter Costello to stop playing Desdemona? Because even Iago is ignoring him/her. If he didn’t have the bo*locks to tackle the poisoned dwarf; how the he*l could he stand up for a principle. Sorry, politicians are trained not to notice a principle, let’s try……a determined pro-active stance on the environment. A soaring intellect which will not allow him to scuttle to placate the Catholic Church at every turn of a Priest’s screw. A determined stand for population control, ditto euthanasia. Where be the guts to face down Dr Death, aka Tony Abbott. Where be the guts to free the Australian people from having a foreign head-of-state? Where be the guts NOT to interfere on every photograph of a naked 10 year old female that surfaces in the media? Has he got the bal*s and the energy to tell Rudd to mind his own effing business and stick to running the country. Has he got the bal*s to admit that he has so far fuc*ed up every opportunity he has been given? If he can’t answer in the affirmative for all of the above, he has got no business cluttering up the political landscape.
Get out of here you bl*ody mongrel.
Can you imagine Costello as PM and being faced with a really big decision like going to war or some such.. he couldnt sum up the courage to have a go at Howard for 11 years and now he apparentlly is shilly shallying on whether to stay or go and all the time being paid by the public purse to write a book for heavens sake when he is meant to be representing his electorate… he is damaged goods and and his ticker makes Big Kims seem like Phar Laps by comparison. Memo Peter : xxxx or get of the pot and by the way what about a refund of your salary for the last 8 months , unless of course the books a JV with the Commonwealth with proceeds to be split accordingly. i’ll give him one thing tho’, he’s honest and candid enough to acknowledge that his popularity rises the less hge says…. says it all really.
yes
Cossie’s got buckley’s…. he literally translates as “close to, resembling, approaching”. All hazy, imprecise and elusive this arrogant ar**hole repeatedly demonstrates a belief that fame and fortune should arrive post haste, personally addressed and beautifully packaged. The once-upon-a-time shadow PM sold on playing hide and seek, gave vague messages for so long he’s forgotten why he’s in the cupboard. I reckon in an early Baptist childhood the poor guy got confused when older brother Tim waxed lyrical about ‘good things come to those who wait’ . If that’s the Liberal Party’s idea of a leader, then keep searching the closet.