Having survived their brush with political death, Northern Territory Labor MLAs met to elect a new ministry this morning — and ushered in a new era in NT politics.
The new ministry will have four indigenous ministers, up from two in the previous Government: Alison Anderson, Karl Hampton, Malarndirri McCarthy and Deputy Leader Marion Scrymgour. Portfolios are to be allocated tomorrow.
The ministry will also have a heavy bush influence, with Anderson, Hampton, McCarthy, Scrymgour and Rob Knight all from rural or primarily indigenous influence — unusual in a Territory where Darwin MLAs have tended to dominate.
Four of the nine ministers are women, with Darwin’s Delia Lawrie remaining in the ministry.
Regardless of the Territory’s reputation for redneckery, no other Australian jurisdiction has come close to such strong indigenous, female and even regional/rural representation in ministerial government — and remember Clare Martin was the first female State or Territory leader elected outside the ACT, in 2001.
The CLP’s first indigenous MLA, Adam Giles, also won the seat of Braitling with the biggest swing to the CLP in the election.
Crikey, why do you have to give this the offensive title of “NT most politically correct ministry in Oz”?
Makes it sound like a sop when in fact it gives non-urban electorates the ministry representation they’ve unfairly missed out on in the past.
Bernard’s right that this marks a new era in NT politics – in this context it’s interesting to note that the two uncontested seats were bush seats (bush seems like the new media code for Indigenous-dominated and rural for non-Indigenous-dominated) and held by Indigenous women, both of whom continue to be strongly linked to their constituency.
Perhaps this is indeed a turning point where indigenous people start the inevitable step of dominating NT politics. Let’s hope so.
I’ve no idea what I was thinking when I wrote the word “influence” instead of “seats”. Can’t even call Dr Freud on that one. They’re all from bush electorates is what I meant.
Judging this new cabinet as “politically correct” is fine, but one has to question whether it will be an improvement on the Government that has been so seriously wounded at this election. That Government was wounded so badly because it delivered extremely poor outcomes, especially under its present leader. It is problematical whether this new “politically correct ” cabinet can deliver any better quality of Government simply by virtue of its ministers being:
1. Indigenous
2. From “bush” seats.
3. Of one sex or the other.
Such commentary, Mr Keane is really quite puerile. This Government will be judged by its future action, or lack thereof,
and being politically correct will absolutely not be a factor when next the people vote.
In actual fact, this cabinet has been selected not on the basis of skills or competence, but simply on the basis of numbers – and in fact who is available. a Cabinet of nine out of just 13 members. Almost in fact a case of “every player wins a prize.” The four who missed out include three new chums elected last Saturday, and the Speaker who simply wants a quiet life on a ministerial salary.
Nothing to do with “political correctness,” competence or any other of your criteria.
Great response Mr Keane. How am I to know you disclaim the heading to your article. I didn’t misinterpret any of your 200 words nor the Headline I simply drew on your words to expand the discussion. And at least I omitted the vulgarity to which you stooped in your attempt to dismiss my perfectly valid observations. If this is a valid tactic for you to employ, may I have the same liberty?
Refreshing for a southern Territorian to see the “Berrimah line” challenged in such a decisive way at the last election. Given that there is a far higher proportion of Aboriginal people in the Territory than anywhere else in our land of Oz, it makes sense that the proportion of political representation wpuld also be higher than anywhere else in Oz. When inevitable political compromises are made in the NT, Aboriginal people and country often bear the brunt. Aboriginal political systems are family based, rather than being based on whitefella systems of democratic representation – leading to what some writers call a “tendency to disaggregation”. This has made appeals to narrow self interest very effective in some regions, at the expense of other regions and language/family groups – this is of course, not restricted in its effectiveness to Aboriginal people!