Just how seriously f-cked are our state politicians?
It’s probably too much to ask for political courage and vision. And we don’t reward it anyway — the last two State leaders with serious reform credentials were Nick Greiner and Jeff Kennett, and both got done over by the electorate, although Greiner limped along for a time in minority government.
But it shouldn’t be too much to ask for basic competence and no corruption. Of the two states in the news on the weekend, WA Labor has struggled with the latter and NSW Labor has demonstrated for some years it is incapable of the former.
Are there any state leaders — premiers or otherwise — of whom voters, or even rusted-on party members, can be proud, or at least feel confident they know where they want to go and how to get there?
Then again, if you were talented and interested in public life, why would you enter state politics? The long-term centralisation of political power in Australia is starving state politics of its policy interest.
State politicians are becoming managers and administrators, barely different from the public servants who work for them. It wasn’t just John Howard’s prolonged assault on federalism that did this. Kevin Rudd’s cooperative federalism, with its emphasis on national harmonisation, will have a similar effect.
But Labor’s shrinking gene pool is exacerbating the problem. Like all political parties, Labor has for decades been drawing on an ever-decreasing pool of talent — people willing to make the sacrifice necessary to participate in public life. But what used to be its strengths have now become weaknesses.
Labor’s trade union links used to guarantee a steady supply of capable men and women who arrived in politics with extensive experience in administration and arguing a case inside the party. This at least would guarantee competence.
But the steady shrinking of trade unions and the professionalization of politics, which produced a clear political career ladder — ministerial adviser, factional player, chief of staff, preselection, ministry, lucrative post-political consultancy career — has ushered in the golden age of the factional hack.
At some point in the last decade, Reba Meagher and the ever more blimp-like Joe Tripodi came to symbolise Labor in NSW. Indeed, Tripodi, in between trips to ICAC, has become a party power broker. The sight of he and Eddie Obeid playing kingmakers last week is a perfect illustration of just how utterly stuffed Labor is in NSW.
Michael Costa was another example of the problem. Costa rapidly ascended to the second highest office in NSW apparently without the one thing critical for a successful career — a capacity for compromise.
In fact, Costa not merely appeared to enjoy fighting for what he believed in, he seemed like he’d fight his own reflection if there was no one else around to target. This is an astonishing failure. Regardless of your ideology or competence, you can’t run a state without an ability to be flexible. If you mentioned flexibility to Costa, he’d tell you to get f-cked, although admittedly that appeared to be his reaction to pretty much anything.
And now one professional party hack in Morris Iemma has been replaced by another in Nathan Rees. Rees may of course turn out to be a political star, although his party has handed him not so much a poisoned chalice as a good old Neville Wran-style sh-t sandwich with a tanking economy and a deeply unpopular government.
Brendan Nelson was his usual consistent self yesterday when he vaguely referred to “looking at the Constitutional arrangements in New South Wales” about an early election, but then backed off when Barrie Cassidy asked him to give some detail. But he’s got a point. If ever there was a government that needed dismissal, it’s this lot.
Rees’s one hope lies across the chamber in Barry O’Farrell. I remember when O’Farrell looked the goods — moderate, pleasant, smart, competent. He managed to blow that the other week when he knocked back Iemma and Costa’s privatisation plan. Suddenly there are big questions about the bloke’s judgement. And the Liberals appear to be suffering from the same shallow talent pool as Labor, although at least, in drawing on legal and small business ranks, they get politicians who’ve actually had some real world experience.
These problems won’t go away. They’ll get worse until we change State politics to make it more appealing to talented people, and our political parties decide that they need to genuinely broaden their memberships. Until then, we’re stuck with the likes of Joe Tripodi.
As we lurched across a back seat in the ministerial car with a blithered minister at the wheel, we asked the same question. How DO morons like this get into public office? I can confidently say it’s a stuffed party system that churns out untalented, unacceptable political advocates such as the above – the likes of those who this week demolished the NSW Iemma Government by putting it on the moral and financial skids. It’s more than a good argument for Federal Minister of State John Faulkner to call on his Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee to deliver a preferred administration model that encourages and commits to best practice in government. Despite economies and communities being far more complex and challenging our political parties keep dishing up the same old obsolete inept candidates as party memberships do a Murray-Darling. These shrivelled low-functioning IQ/ EQ pools under antiquated Party administration are more concerned about policy appeal than upshot, candidate charisma than character and indoctrination not education. They shifted the public service goal posts to accommodate biased appointees so these ordinary candidates could seek out like-minds from a de-politicised public service. Why we put such visionless inexperienced amateurs through the doors of parliament with our lives and billion dollar economies to manage, I’ve no idea. May be John Faulkner and his committee can come up with something more appropriate.
Gotta agree with Sponge Boy! One of the best pieces of politics in recent times. Bernard you should have pointed out months ago that it was Costa in ’97 who was the architect of scuttling Carr and Egan electricity privatisation whwn he was the head of the Labor Council.
Nathan Rees sure does look the goods. He’ll prove that white men can jump. He’s not a woman but his feminist mum left an indelible impression on him. He maybe Catholic but he still compared George Pell with a serial boofhead. What a breath of fresh air. He got rid of most of the mafia that was running the state. In Macquarie Street, they are already calling it the Mortein cabinet — no wogs.
Sponge Boy and Noddy,
Barry O’Farrell might have some scalps but he has lost his credibility. That makes him a good opposition leader but I thought he wanted to be the Premier. O’Farrell is now unelectable. Rees will do him like Iemma did Debnam because he stands for nothing. The only way forward for the Libs now is for Mike Baird to become the opposition leader.
Barry O’Farrell blew it? Come on, if he hadn’t done what he did Watkins, Iemma, Costa, Sartor and Meagher would still be there. 5 big scalps in a week – more than any Liberal leader since whenever. None would have gone without him. If this is blowing it, what do you call success?