The AFL’s disappointing September crowds and poor TV ratings over the year can be explained away by all manner of possible alibis and paper-thin excuses — Geelong’s dominance, the Olympic Games, Sydney’s fickle form, WA’s two teams not firing a shot, ticket prices, food prices, the A-League’s success — but there’s an elephant in the room no-one has been brave enough to point out: the game is becoming dull.
It’s that simple. The once free-flowing spectacle, that dazzled all who came within its orbit, is slowly turning into a dreary, vanilla, homogenised, sanitised, over-regulated, over-umpired bore.
The problems are manifold but they start with coaches stifling the creativity out of the contest — and it hasn’t helped that three of this year’s finalists, St Kilda, Sydney and Adelaide, are among the worst offenders. Why would any neutral fan in their right mind even think about watching Adelaide v St Kilda on the telly? You must be joking. I’d take Vasili’s Garden Show on Channel 31 any day. Or a poke in the eye.
Players are now so fit, and capable of covering so much ground in the course of a match, that there is less room to strut their stuff and show off their balletic skills, in the way that Robbie Flower and Keith Greig and Doug Hawkins used to do in the acres of space down the MCG wings. Some commentators, such as Tim Lane, have suggested reducing the number of players on the ground to free up the congested mess that often passes for a match. The idea has merit.
And the umpires, presumably under instructions from league headquarters, have anaesthetised the game into a stupor. The most minor infraction is penalised and it often takes the replay to be shown on the big screen before the crowd understands what the infraction was. Even then, they’re sometimes none the wiser.
On top of that, there appears to be a growing disconnection between game and fan. The sport is drifting too far from its suburban roots. Maybe it’s because I’m of a certain age, but the experience of sitting under a closed roof at Telstra Dome in the middle of the afternoon, where sushi and salads and focaccia are served, does not feel like footy to me. It feels like an afternoon at World Youth Day. Or watching day-time TV with the blinds pulled down.
These issues have been underscored, and writ large, in this finals series. Collectively, it has been a shocker. Eight games have been played and none of them are in any danger of featuring on the AFL-endorsed season-highlights DVD. The closest, and best, of the eight was the Bulldogs-Geelong match last weekend which ended in a 29-point win for the Cats. Otherwise, the finals have been one-sided and almost completely devoid of tension.
Contrast this with the NRL finals series, which has produced a highlight reel that will be played down the ages, brimming as it does with spectacular tries, big hits, underdogs getting up and, yes, passion.
Whoever had the privilege to see the Melbourne Storm’s win over Brisbane last weekend will know what I’m talking about. Some veteran league observers have described the match, decided by a Greg Inglis try in the last minute, as among the best they’ve seen.
That came a week after the eighth-placed Warriors inflicted similar heartache on the Storm in the dying minutes at Olympic Park. The Warriors, with the talismanic Ruben Wiki leading the way in his farewell season, upset the reigning premiers then steamrolled the Roosters last week.
Every finals series needs an inspiring underdog story, something for the unattached to latch on to, and the Kiwis have provided the NRL with one, in spades. Shame the same can’t be said about the AFL where the top four sides routinely filled the four preliminary final berths.
I never thought I’d say this, (in fact I’ve got an appointment with the doctor this afternoon because I think I’ve come down with something serious) but the NRL, for all its player defections and appalling off-field behaviour, is growing on me. And I’m hoping it’s just benign. This year, I have found myself getting more worked up and involved watching an NRL game than I do with the AFL. Why is that? I don’t know but I’m hoping the quack can diagnose the problem, and prescribe the necessary antibiotics.
Certainly, NRL has stayed truer to its fans. There are standing-room sections at its grounds and, unless I’m way off beam, I doubt sushi is served at Mt Smart or Parramatta Stadiums.
That’s why, for the sake of the code, the AFL grand final on Saturday needs to be a good ‘un. We need a memorable game to redeem the finals series and remind us why we love the game.
In Geelong and Hawthorn, the two standout teams are playing, so that’s a good start. They’re both in powerful form, with all their good players — apart from Luke Hodge, with cracked ribs — in peak condition and near the top of their game. And, importantly in these worrying times, they like to play the game by attacking and moving forwards, not backwards and laterally like three of their fellow-finalists.
A reprise of their 1989 grand final classic is too much to hope for, but something to stir the passions, get the sap rising and set the pulse racing would do just fine.
This flooding tactic has been borrowed straight from soccer. Most Australians find soccer boring to watch because stopping goals, rather than scoring them, appears to be the priority for 95% of teams. This is why you see lots of 0-0 draws. Milking frees and penalties, combined with time-wasting is another acceptable facet of this particular sport. Caution and cynicism are rewarded more often than not in the so-called “world game” ,because it’s a low-scoring sport devoid of any real physicality. That’s fair enough for Europeans, Latin Americans etc, after all it’s their game.
The difference is, our indigenous footy code needs to be played with honesty and raw courage to be a worthwhile spectacle. Adopting cynical defensive tactics from a sport that lacks true physical commitment and courage is not the way forward. Same goes for over-officiating – another soccer trait. If they had any sense, which they don’t, the AFL would step in and put a stop to the soccer-fication of Australian Rules Footy.
Drop forward pockets – 4 less players on the field and room to ‘run forward’
How about a soccer-type rule to prevent flooding – must have ‘x’ number of players in your back half at all times.
Rugby league is a much better TV spectacle, although all the video replays to check the legitimacy of tries gets tiring after a while.
AFL needs to somehow get the old-fashioned Tony Liberatore types back into the game – today it seems as if every player has the same slim-line athletic build.
Here’s hoping Barry Hall switches to league (his build would be ideally suited). Ben Cousins would go well too (as a playmaker) but you can keep him – we’ve got enough drug-abusers as it is.
By the way, as a former Richmond supporter I couldn’t believe Matthew Richardson polled so well in the Brownlow. Did they finally put him back on the wing and give him room to move. Incidentally, Adam Goodes started on the wing as well … get rid of forward pockets and watch what happens.
Anthony Zanos
Expatriate Victorian
Well said Charlie Happell on the current state of the AFL. It needed to be said but it is probably too much to hope for it to be acted on. The standard is abysmal _ apart from the two grand final teams _ and yet we have a money-hungry hierarchy insisting there is room in the competion for two more sides. Give us a break!
As a very one-eyed Saints fan, I can only endorse your comments about the dullness of the game in general and the Sts. in particular.
The enjoyable games I watched this year were a result of the ineptitude of the players at employing the negative corralling tactics of our coach. Having conceded a lead, the Sts. were forced to fight back from behind, not a St.K tradition. When we went on the attack, we were as exciting as any side and, win or lose, were entertaining to watch, eg v NM, Coll, Fre, Haw. To defend our coach and others, they have been forced to adopt the corralling and flooding to counteract the running from half back, rugby style of game. (It doesn’t propagate man on man game style either.)
It is understandable that you might be beginning to waver in your regard for our once great game in favour of Rugby League. First, Aussie Rules has never been a great game on television. Secondly, it is frustrating to see Demetriou and his cronies whore the game to television, disenfranchising the core supporter while chasing a demographic (including the politically correct; Sydney-based Swans fans; and a stratum of the female population) who barely understand the rules, certainly not the culture.
Telstra dome games are sanitized for our protection. From what? I miss standing in the rain at Moorabbin and the (mostly good-natured) volatility of the supporters of both sides. When a good day for St.Kilda was anything less than a ten goal loss, the atmosphere of the Wailing Wall and the Animal Enclosure made for a great day out in the same way as in golf, a flakey wedge, pin high, compensates for a round of 115.
GIVE US OUR GAME BACK
“The A-League’s success” ?!?!?!?
I think you’ll find that the A-League (or Z-League if you like) has been struggling to deliver on the FFA’s laughable hype for some time and the novelty factor is starting to wear off. In Perth, the oldest franchise recently struggled to get 5000 paying fans through the gates. The alarm bells are starting to go off and the competition is barely 3 years old.
The Sydney Swans’ crowds are streets ahead of Sydney FC’s – all this despite on-going renovations to the SCG and competition from the Rugby codes.