Anyone reading the media’s coverage of Australia‘s US opening weekend box office figures reaction may conclude that Baz’s latest offering is both the most appallingly acted, written and directed movie since Gigli and a financial flop of Waterworld-esque proportions. In a continuation of their gloomy narrative on the Australian film industry, the local press has cited weekend US takings as irrefutable evidence that the movie is already a “flop”, that Baz Luhrmann’s Oscar hopes are over and that American audiences just don’t care.
But a fifth-placed opening weekend for a movie of the nature of Australia shapes as a decent platform for a long run in North America. Variety notes that Australia‘s $14.8 million in takings is higher than Luhrmann’s previous US successes, Romeo + Juliet and Moulin Rouge , while movie tracking site Box Office Mojo compares Australia’s opening weekend favourably with other Kidman Thanksgiving epics Cold Mountain and Far and Away (… and Colin Farrell vehicle Alexander , while we’re at it). While it’s in Fox’s interest to spin these figures wherever possible, industry standards Variety and Hollywood Reporter have a pretty good track record of finding the truth in the takings.
So what’s going on here? It seems the combination of an unwillingness to break a decade-old tradition of Oz film bashing and an obsession with Nicole Kidman’s forehead may be infecting some Australian reporters’ abilities to sensibly interpret a simple list of figures. Perhaps, as the Huffington Post noted over the weekend, we cynical locals just need to open our heart and let the magic wash over us:
The takings according to local media:
Vince and Reese killing Nic and Hugh Australia has opened poorly in North American cinemas, possibly torpedoing the Oscar chances of director Baz Luhrmann. Australia opened in 2600 theatres across the US and Canada on Wednesday for the lucrative Thanksgiving long weekend, but audiences have largely snubbed the movie — The Herald Sun
Baz Lurhmann epic flops as America ignores Australia Baz Luhrmann’s epic starring Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman has had a mediocre opening in its homeland and in North America … Anecdotally at least, the film is not filling cinemas, with several art-house cinemas reporting less than stellar business and an antipathy among younger audience members to the film’s mass-marketing and media campaign — The Australian
Americans turn back on Baz Luhrmann’s Australia The uninspiring opening for Australia will likely damage the Oscar prospects for Kidman, Jackman and director-producer-screenwriter Luhrmann and it also raises the question if the Hollywood studio backing the film, Rupert Murdoch’s Twentieth Century Fox, will make money on its huge four-year investment in the project — The Canberra Times
The takings according to US media:
‘Christmases’ wraps up box office After a soft Wednesday debut, Australia noticeably picked up the pace as adults were sprung from holiday duties. Film logged a 96% bump Friday — considered the biggest single moviegoing day of the year — the largest uptick among non-family titles … Fox is confident Australia will at least match the domestic gross of Moulin Rouge , based on good word-of-mouth. On Saturday, when the overall box office dipped 6% over Friday, the Fox film declined only 1% — Variety
Chris Aronson, a senior vice president with the studio, said he believed the opening promised a strong run through the holiday season, when movies tend to remain in theaters for many weeks. “These are great numbers for an adult film,” Mr. Aronson said – The New York Times
‘Four Christmases’ takes Thanksgiving b.o. Fox’s relatively well-reviewed Baz Luhrmann-helmed action adventure Australia , starring Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman, has registered $10.9 in opening coin through Friday. That included a $5.7 million Friday gross – Hollywood Reporter
Quoting wikipedia:
“The Interpreter is the first movie ever filmed inside the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council chambers. Earlier films used only the exteriors or were filmed back when the buildings were under construction (and did not really have an “inside”). The producers approached the U.N. about filming there before, but their request was turned down. The production would have relocated to Toronto with a constructed set; however, this would have substantially increased costs, and so Sydney Pollack approached then-Secretary General Kofi Annan directly, and personally negotiated permission to film inside the United Nations. Annan commented on The Interpreter that “the intention was really to do something dignified, something that is honest and reflects the work that this Organization does. And it is with that spirit that the producers and the directors approached their work, and I hope you will all agree they have done that.”
Out here on the grassy knoll we recall that Koffi Annan as Secretary General of the UN sponsored the WMD inspections team which found against the George W Bush claims for going to war in Iraq.
This naturally outraged the Neo cons and the dogs were let loose on the New York based UN via News Corp ‘fair and balanced’ via Fox etc. Their mission – to discredit the UN generally.
At the time in 2005 Koffi pulled off some pretty impressive PR political moves to withstand the nastiness. One was a global release of a Nicole Kidman movie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Interpreter
Kidman was very good in this movie with a perfect French African English accent, opposite old lefty Sean Penn. It was roughly about this time that Jamie Fawcett and Co were let loose on Kidman as a target also. And who was buying their snaps? The pro Iraq war News Corp. I think Ledger got the same harrassment after speaking against the Iraq war on the Denton show.
This kind of thing goes back all the way to Charlie Chaplin repudiating McCarthyism, an actor who spent time in a poor house as a kid. And stood against Nazism when it counted, only to be deported while on holiday by Uncle Sam. He got an academy award in 1972 to say sorry.
Thats all very well, and we must agree to some extent, but does that mean any critical review of “Australia” is just vinegar? I thought it was really predictable/boring/cliched and just inbred really. Arent there any other australian actors besides the sarcophagii which are always dragged out for re-bandaging?, and is this really representative of…us?…but even as an epic, well Yawn….and i know this is wrong of me, but im tired of token blackfellas…the real ones are so much more “Australia” than this….or is it really a reflection? gasp.
Good on you Michael for telling some truths. A friend called from Seattle the other night saying they had just got in from seeing ‘Australia’ and were miffed that they had to take the second row as it was sold out.