Democracy is coming…to the USA — Leonard Cohen.
Wow, some weeks are like an Australian landscape – or an Australian movie – flat and featureless in all directions, and others are like New Zealand with every conceivable feature squeezed up against each other. In Australia it was rich enough, with the Utegate doing circle work in the parliamentary carpark, Libs lining up to cross the floor, and the ETS dying in the Senate barely noticed. Iran, res ipsa loquitur.
But the most interesting transformation has been in the US, where the combination of the Iran crisis and the double-whammy scandals of John Ensign and Mark Sanford have contributed further to the fragmentation of defiend political positions in the states.
Most of this has been to the detriment of the Republicans, but I won’t gloat about that – gotta save something for next week – but far more interesting is the way in which political positioning has become a sort of chinese checkers in which everyone is leaping across everyone else.
The most interesting thing is the way in which Barack Obama has effectively been positioned as, in foreign policy terms, the first Burkean conservative US President in decades. The Cairo speech was a clear example of this – a statement that while the US would not resile from having a set of concrete values, it would not define itself around projecting power onto others, or a simple unitary formula for modernity and the good society.
Whether that had an effect on the Lebanon election, and lessened the support that territorial defenders such as Hezbollah might have got remains to be seen – the right, who ridicule it, are forever looking for a delayed Bush effect – but there is now doubt that it is more likely than support for an Israeli invasion or threats to wholesale bomb the region have been.
Some on the left – John Pilger is the most noteable example – will suggest that Obama is simply another imperialist President. There’s a lot of evidence for that, but overall the case seems unsustainable. The biggest case for Obama the imperialist comes from Afghanistan – where (or on the Af-Pak) border this week, while Americans were yammering about beacon of freedom and human rights, another drone killed dozens of civilians – and Bagram Prisoner of Non-Declared War camp is expanding to effectively take up the slack left by Gitmo – and that prosecution of the war is utterly indefensible and has to be attacked at every turn.
Personally, I don’t believe that Obama wants a 10 year war there, but wants to get out from a position of strength, but that may be the booze talking.
What is certain is that, with the Afghan war going on, Obama couldn’t consistently speak from a liberal human rights approach without looking utterly ludicrous – and his Burkean realism is throwing the liberal-left into disarray, torn between their idea of Obama, and the reality of his gradual shift in US-world relations.
But the right has gone simply crazy. On FOX News Charles Krauthammer derided Obama for saying he was putting ‘US interests first’ – in comparison to the noble task of advancing freedom thriugh useless rhetoric. Is this a bizarre new low in the history of the right? What mad jig have they got on that they see themselves as some sort of revolutionary suicide squad?
Signs are that the FOX/Krauthammer crowd are getting a pasting from what is emerging as a new centre-right more aligned with Obama than the GOP. On the right-shifted Morning Joe show on MSNBC, former soc con congressman Joe Scarboroiugh derided fellow GOPers for their irrationality, and the same has come from a host of columnists and congressman.
Meanwhile people like Chris Matthews keep reminding people that the US spent a half century screwing up Iranian democracy, and amazingly, the idea that the US should butt out of people’s affairs, is becoming a part of public discourse.
The only people who don’t yet get it are the burnout right, and the burnout cruise missile left, together in a reality of their own making.
Strange days indeed, when Laughing Len is a guide to political outcomes.
Actually, I think Pilger makes a good case for his argument, one that I too make on my blog, En Passant, (http://enpassant.com.au), about Obama in quite a few posts. He is the Commander in Chief of Terror as the Afghanistan/Pakistan wars show.
But imperialism is not just about the US invading weaker countries. It is about them doing that and a whole range of other actions in the eternal chess game against their imperialist rivals like China, Europe and so on.
For example, among other things US support for Israel means that they have their own imperialist armed wing there that destabilises the whole region and makes it easier for the US to control the overall flow of oil to its imperialist rivals and receive cheap oil through the subjugation of the working classes in the region under US friendly dictatorships.
The invasion of Iraq is also partly explicable in that context.
Deutscher Prize winner Rick Kuhn (author of Henryk Grossman and the Recovery of Marxism) is leading a discussion group for Socialist Alternative next week in Canberra on Thursday 2 July on imperialism and it will cover basics such as what imperialism is and what it means in practice.
I agree with you John Passant. I have a lot of respect for John Pilger’s integrity and he’s not fearful of upsetting the US, or the British, or anyone else for that matter. Once it’s realized that the US foreign policies and its energy policies are intertwined, the rest is just natural progression. The US has either interfered with or invaded about 50 countries since the end of WW2. It hasn’t found any new oil wells since the 70’s. Successive Presidents haven’t shown any indication until now, to wean the citizens from its obscene oil guzzling habits. How easily people forget the invasions and horrific murders in Central America. The horrific injustice done to the people of Diego Garcia by Britain for the US – I found out via John Pilger; as I did about Pol Pot years ago, and the reality of Vietnam. If only there were more journalists like him.
Why is the US in Somalia? Because there’s heaps of oil worth heaps of money. The US is not interested in the horror that Africans, or anyone else is suffering for that matter. It’s all to do with power, wealth, the war machine and energy! The President is just a ‘tool’ for big wealth, the war machine and OIL companies etc.
Read, From Afghanistan to Iraq-Connecting the dots with OIL. The invasion of both these countries is to do with oil. Why has the US built a $800 million Embassy in Iraq? It’s huge! A small city in fact.
It would appear, that what we are seeing in Iran is courtesy of the CIA, who are probably taking advantage of those in Iran who want a different form of government than what they’ve had – thanks to the US interference over decades; they’ve created the present. If the US is only interested in the people etc, why aren’t they doing something about Burma, Indonesia and too many countries in Africa to mention, including Muggabe – NO OIL! Australia trains the military in Burma, WHY? We also assist the murdering bastards in Indonesia, who murdered 180,000 people in East Timor? It’s sickening! The hypocrisy and the gobbly gook is nauseating.
John Pilger has written about the lot of these injustices. His articles and opinions don’t appear in the corporate or mainstream media. I wonder why? Why doesn’t Kerry O’Brien for example, interview John Pilger instead of the war mongers he has on. I recall the weeks leading up to the invasion of Iraq, and several weeks after – it was obscene – straight from the White House & Pentagon! I stopped watching, and I still won’t listen/watch those war mongers who salivated over the criminal and lethal actions of Bush/Blair and Howard! I don’t think they used the words ‘dead’ or ‘kill’ once. It’s getting worse! So Obama says he’s going to close Gittmo. What about Abu Graib and the other jails in Iraq? What about what is sanctioned by the so-called govts in both Iraq & Afghanistan? The over 120 dead in US raid in recent days. The US first denies, than starts the ‘lie machine’ to cover up. What’s the difference between this and Iran? Very little!
Yes, John Pilger is right. There’s no REAL difference. He says one thing in front of the camera, and once the light is turned off, it’s back to business. Look at Congress and what they’ve been doing for decades! Nothing has changed!
Thanks Liz45 for the support.
I disagree with you on one point. The unrest in Iran is not CIA inspired.
It is a split among the ruling elite about the way forward economically and that has opened up a space for the masses to demand basic democratic rights.
Repression may keep a lid on the revolution for a while but not for ever.