There are some things that the Chinese Government clearly doesn’t understand. The rule of law, for instance. Or that being out-negotiated in commercial dealings doesn’t necessarily reflect the fact that your counterparts spied on you. That shifting millions of your people into an occupied country isn’t likely to go down well with the original inhabitants.
Public relations is another. Two months ago, virtually no Australians would have heard of Rabiya Kadeer or the Uyghur people. While days of mayhem and violence in Urumqi in July might have raised the profile of the Uyghur cause, it has only been China’s clumsy efforts to censor all mention of Kadeer that have given her priceless publicity in this country. What would have been a non-event visit celebrated by some Bob Brown press releases suddenly became interesting. Criticising the Melbourne International Film Festival, complete with attacks by sinofascist hackers on both the MIFF (yes I spelt that right) websites and any others that mentioned Melbourne Festivals, was a good start. Demanding Australia not let Kadeer in gave the issue momentum.
But trying to get the National Press Club to cancel Kadeer’s address today went much further. Not merely did it get The Australian, not exactly the most Sinophobic media outlet around, upset, but it aroused the interest of the Press Gallery. Suddenly, now, the national media wants to cover the yarn. Even yesterday, there was little interest in covering Kadeer’s address today. But The Australian’s revelations about Chinese pressure on the NPC changed all that, given an otherwise nondescript story about China’s internal ethnic troubles a local angle. Public relations gold for Kadeer and, for that matter, the Press Club.
The only question now is whether the Chinese will complete the promotional opportunity by coordinating the protest of some local and bussed-in Chinese students against “splittists” and “western interference in Chinese internal affairs”.
There’s no doubting the nationalist feelings of Chinese students in Australia or the level of malice toward Uyghurs. At the Olympic torch ceremony in Canberra last year, the one point at which things looked like getting out of hand — if you weren’t one of the many Australian protesters mobbed by ranting Chinese students — was when a small group of Uyghurs marched out of the area in which the ceremony was being held. This prompted a surge of several hundred flag-waving students to rush the barricades nearby and scream abuse at the silent marchers. The hate in the eyes of those students was real and should worry the Paul Keatings of the world who think “the rise of China” will necessarily be a peaceful affair.
The Oz editorialised against the Chinese Government, rightly. But, really, China should be encouraged to keep conducting itself in exactly the way it has been. It serves to promote the cause of its opponents in ways they could never manage themselves.
When the Palestinian human-rights activist Dr Hanan Ashrawi was awarded the 2003 Sydney Peace Prize by Sydney University’s Sydney Peace Foundation, her award and visit were opposed vehemently by the Israeli government through a campaign by its local supporters and advocates :Frank Lowy, the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) and the Zionist Federation. Threats were made to pull funds out of the Sydney Peace Foundation, NSW Premier Bob Carr was lobbied to desist from personally awarding the prize and the Lord Mayor Lucy Turnbull of the City of Sydney boycotted the award. No outcry and no editorials against the Israeli government then.
Uh Stephen thats not what I remember – I remember there being a lot of controversy about Israelis and their domestic supporters describing any criticism of Israeli Government policy as anti-Semitism etc. I think the difference between that and now is that we are used to the Israeli/Jewish lobby being incredibly hamfisted in pursuing their goals – this is one of the first major incidents of the Chinese Government putting its foot in its mouth that most of us in Australia are aware of.
On the other hand, I find it hard to believe that the Chinese Government is unaware of how much it is inflating the Uyghur cause in Australia or indeed internationally by its actions. It seems more as though the Chinese Government wishes to be recognised as the new big player on the world stage and any excuse to to throw its weight around – however hamfisted – still serves the goal of intimidating the rest of the world.
One is reminded of WH Auden’s small, but perfectly formed poem, on totalitarianism.
The Ogre does what ogres can,
Deeds quite impossible for Man,
But one prize is beyond his reach,
The Ogre cannot master Speech.
About a subjugated plain,
Among its desperate and slain,
The Ogre stalks with hands on hips
While drivel gushes from his lips.
Whether amerikan exceptionalism, chinee Heavenly Realm or Benito’s Roma Renaissant, power tends, as Acton said, to corrupt. And absolute power over a quarter of this particular planet’s population has the forewarned effect.
One taboo subject seems to be that any country of over 1 billion is far too big to represent its population with efficacy. That surely applies to India also and probably quite a few other real big countries like Indonesia and Pakistan and USA.
But then as an Australia I guess I would say that.