A leading Victorian ALP elder statesman has condemned the party’s sclerotic processes for processing membership applications, increasing pressure on Premier John Brumby to appoint a membership czar to clean out stacked branches.
In a speech to an internal seminar in the Higgins federal electorate assembly on 9 August, an account of which has been obtained by Crikey, former Cain government cabinet minister Race Mathews revealed that some genuine members had their membership applications delayed for up to two years.
In an indictment of the party’s legendary factional feuding, Mathews said entrenched interests had blocked swathes of legitimate applications. Administrative blunders and incompetence were also to blame.
Under internal ALP party rules, applications for membership are required to be processed by both the local branch and a membership sub-committee of the Administrative Committee, which was until recently controlled by the party’s right.
A protocol that membership applications be addressed within one month has only recently been reprised, Mathews said.
In a stinging assessment of the state party, Mathews told the meeting young members would continue to abandon the ALP in droves without a massive reform effort. Online social networking sites such Facebook and Twitter could be utilised in revitalised grassroots push, Mathews said.
The meeting heard that the cancer of branch stacking continued to infect the party — 70% of delegates to state conference came from 40% of electorates, usually those dominated by ethnic warlords.
One proposal to iron out branch stacking was to reduce barriers to membership by slashing annual fees, a proposal that could cost the state branch revenue.
The membership renewal process also came under the spotlight. Mathews said renewals should be submitted by the member in question, to avoid a repeat of this year’s notorious deadline day debacle, where notorious figures named in the Victorian Ombudsman’s report into Brimbank council, including Hakki Suleyman, oversaw the delivery of local stacks, as revealed by Crikey.
Mathews, who is factionally aligned to the right of the party, cited the 1998 Dreyfus report into the Victorian branch, a 2002 national review conducted by Bob Hawke and Neville Wran, and a 2005 review of the Victorian state branch as documents that require urgent revisiting.
Key proposals of the Dreyfus report, including online and formal university branches, need to be acted on now, Mathews told the Higgins meeting.
Other delegates called for a charter of members rights and an independent ombudsman to monitor renewals.
They described “an enormous sense of frustration that the party is controlled by a small clique who want to keep the party small”, with dissidents calling on the factions to be abolished outright.
Thousands of delegates from Victorian ALP branches, including Mathews’ Prahran branch, have signed a petition calling for the appointment of a party elder to crack down on rorts, although there remains concern that a stacks ban would cripple the voting power of John Brumby’s ruling right faction, leading to windfall gains for the Left.
The petition was closed before the 9 August meeting, but it is believed hundreds more of the state’s 6,500 non-stacked members would have signed if given the chance.
Mathews told Crikey this morning that the party should be urgently “opened up” so that the party could “go for growth”.
“We’ve just stood by and wasted 10 years”, Matthews said, claiming several enquiries had been left to gather dust.
“The tragedy is that we have visited this issue three times over the last decade and know how to fix things.”
Meanwhile, the Independent faction leader Eric Dearricott-initiated special purpose review into branch stacking has been receiving submissions, according to reports. Mathews told Crikey his Higgins FEA had also filed a submission, but it was yet to be formally considered.
Here’s my tale of woe.
Moved to Northcote after being a member elsewhere for several years. Attended the local branch and joined up. So far so good. Moved states a couple of times and transfered my membership. Came home and was told I was unfinancial, How could this be? I’d taken the precaution of filling out an automatic credit card deduction. Oh well somehow that wasn’t processed. I knew enough about appeals to admin committee to not bother fighting for continuity and just rejoined.
It was around this time that the party went through the bullsh*t consultation process where the only meeting in metro melbourne was at the Whitten oval – in winter! That’s consultation for you. Following her opinion piece in the Age about the need to involve the rank and file, I sent an e-mail to Guillard’s office asking for a better more inclusive process only to receive an automatic advice that my message had been deleted without being read.
I rejoined at my local branch at a branch meeting but when I got my membership (after a long delay) it was a central branch membership. I spoke to my local branch and they got me to fill the form in again. I heard nothing and contacted the state secretariat to be told I was a central branch member. Well I love an arguement but I judged that this was not a fight I’d win so I asked what could I do to become a local branch member? I was told I’d filled out the wrong form and I’d have to resubmit my membership. Ok Please send me the form. Form filled resubmitted – nothing. Ring again and this time I’m told to attend my local branch sign the book and fill out the form there and then. Well I’ve already done that. OK get your branch secretary to write to us and say you’ve joined locally. After a bit of toing and froing he so did. He showed me the letter. Nothing. Tried one more time only to be told a range of repetetive contradictory directions none of which led to me being granted local branch membership.
Moved interstate joined local branch participated fully until I resigned due to what I judged to be a conflict with my job.
Moved back home, new job, no conflict, let’s rejoin. The first thing I found out was that the meetings had moved venues. I was given five different venues none of which were correct. Apparently the state secretariat don’t even know where my branch meets. At one point I was told the meeting was at an address I immediately recognised as the Misso’s office in Capel Street. ‘That’s North Melbourne’ I said ‘not Northcote’ Well that’s what my spread sheet says. was the dull retort.
I went to each of the five venues only to find the party had moved on. I didn’t try Capel street.
Eventually even I tired of this Kafkaesque fairytale and gave up trying to have a direct role in the public life of my nation.
This might be a different story if I was just some mug punter dipping a toe into the ALP for the first time but I first joined in 1993, I hand out or scrutineer at most elections, I’ve been a sub-branch president of two branches for a total of about six years, a conference delegate several times and actively involved in a faction. If I can’t get through the tendencious shennanigans (yes, I call shennanigans on the Vic ALP) stupidity and incompetence of the Victorian party what hope do ordinary interested activist have and what does this mean for a party that once saw itself as a broad-based, progressive party? More vitally how do we maintain a democratic nation with such organs?
could crikey please do a follow up to the Brimbank council report showing what people were accused of and what actions were taken against them.
eg.Justin Madden was accused of ….. he was removed from ….. position and now holds….. position.
It appears that no action has been taken due to the report.
Business as usual in the Vic ALP