After Tuesday night’s Sydney Ideas lecture by Saree Makdisi, professor of English Literature at the University of California and nephew of the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said, chief executive of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies, Vic Alhadeff, asked a question. He wanted to know why Makdisi had ignored the extreme Hamas charter, Palestinian rejectionism and constant Israeli peace offers since 1948. “You’ve only told one side of the story,” Alhadeff claimed.
Makdisi responded with passion, claiming that Alhadeff and the Zionist position he represented only saw in Israel and Palestine what they wanted to see. Alhadeff started his question by saying that, “we all believe the occupation should have ended yesterday”, and yet Makdisi countered that Israel’s supposedly serious peace offerings were bogus as long as the occupation of the West Bank deepened every day.
It was a point he made on ABC Radio’s The World Today last week. Equality, justice and peace can never be achieved when fundamentalist, Jewish colonialists continue to control vital West Bank territory.
About 200 people packed into Sydney University’s Seymour Centre on Tuesday night (disclosure: I introduced Makdisi) and the crowd was diverse. Although there were few Jewish attendees — I knew maybe five — there were countless Palestinians, Arabs and concerned citizens of various ages. His talk in Melbourne last week (covered in The Age), was equally popular, I’m told, people drawn to the growing global consensus that apartheid is occurring in the occupied territories with total Western support (the audio is here).
Makdisi spoke principally last night about Jerusalem’s proposed Museum of Tolerance, to be built on a sacred Muslim cemetery. He explained how the Zionist backers of the project appear oblivious or uncaring towards the sensitivities of the Palestinian population and want to create a space where Jewish “unity” is celebrated rather than real reconciliation with the Arab population.
Makdisi argued that the only way to fairly solve the Middle East crisis — he had no faith in Barack Obama, despite having known him years ago in Chicago and saying he was a good politician — was a one-state solution with equal rights for all its citizens. A democracy like any other Western state, such as America or Australia, that theoretically thrives on its multicultural mix, rather than Israel that wants ethnic and racial purity.
Makdisi’s Edward Said Memorial Lecture, given last weekend at the University of Adelaide, is a catalogue of life for Palestinians under occupation, a reality rarely told in the Western media. An extract:
According to a report published in July 2007 by the United Nations Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA), almost 40 percent of the West Bank [SLIDE] is now taken up by Israeli infrastructure (roads, colonies, army bases, etc) to which indigenous Palestinians are largely denied access. The pace of Jewish colonisation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — colonisation that has taken place on the illegally expropriated private property of Palestinian families or, equally illegally, on land that was declared state property by the Israeli army — has not significantly slackened for one moment in the past four decades, even though Israel’s colonial enterprise has been repeatedly condemned as a violation of international law by the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council as well as the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
Makdisi’s solution to the conflict is not to wait for the Obama administration to move into gear — he told me that America had shown no indication of getting serious with the peace process — but a global boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign targeting complicit Israeli institutions. Such thoughts, gathering pace across the world, are making defenders of the occupation status quo here in Australia rightly uncomfortable.
I spoke to several people last night who told me that such talks in Australia about occupation were happening with increasing frequency. “Twenty years ago.” one attendee told me, “you never heard about the Palestinians. Now you do, but they have no power.”
Antony Loewenstein is a journalist and author of My Israel Question.
I’m confused Antony: I understood a ‘one state solution’ has been rejected by the Palestinians; going back to the Peel Report of the 1930s, in 1948 with the UN partitian and ever since then. I thought the Palestinians wanted their own state, or is it that they want the same area as Israel, only with all the Jewish people removed? The Hamas Constitution appears to reject both a one state solution and the rights of Jews to exist in this disputed region, so how will this work?
Also, what status does Gaza have? Isn’t it technically independent, with it’s own government and a big fence between it and it’s waring neighbour? Isn’t that a separate state, albeit one where they still throw things over the fence?
And further, if there is one state, how will Sha’ria law operate in this new democracy? Will certain parts of this democracy have the right to refuse women equality, the vote etc or will it accommodate all religions?
And please Antony, can you help organise a boycott of China and Sri Lanka and Burma and Iran et al. Surely, to be consistent, Australians must stop trading, visiting, contacting or having anything to do with ALL countries who have appropraite lands and subjegate peoples?
I heard a similar talk in the mid 80ies at ANU law school. How shameful it is to recall now.
The balance that Mr Alhadeff might have been better to raise is the ritual posturing of surrounding Arab and also Persian/Iranian states in support of Palestine, but more as a political play thing to manipulate and dog whistle their own domestic politics. Are major party politicians the same opportunistic chancers the world over?
We had Saddam systematically ripping his country off but buying popularity with grants to families of suicide bombers. We have the Iranian President ripping off democratic reforms but sledging Israel’s existence at the same time.
I reckon if OPEC put a US 5cent transparent and honest tax regime on every barrel of oil to be allocated to Palestinian reconstruction, media, advocacy and medical support, and yes lobbying of US Congress, and education funding, we would see an enforced peace deal pretty soon.
Walter Slurry: there you go again..so you’re saying it’s OK to beat my wife ‘cos so do a few of my friends?
Do you realise just how stupid that argument is?
It has about as much substance as the term ‘self-hating Jew’ used by right wing Zionists against any Jew who speaks out against the morally corrupt Israeli Government.
Well I’m off to the Australians For Palestine rally at the Sydney Town Hall in my BOYCOTT ISRAEL NOW 2009 T shirt.
Ah yes, the problem you have with consistency kevin Herbert. It’s okay to boycott Israel because you don’t like their defence of their lives, but when someone says, isn’t that inconsistent because we trade with nations who do worse than a minor conflict, such as China, you bring up some spurious analogy right out of the kindergarten handbook of insults.
As I’ve said on a few blogs here pal, I doubt you’ve ever been to the Gaza or the West bank, or even Jordan, Lebanon or Syria. I doubt you’ve ever done more than read a few websites and formed your views based on what other people say.
Can I suggest, again, that you get on a plane and go to Gaza. They’d welcome you buddy boy, with open arms. Meanwhile, wear your T -shirt if that empowers you. And maybe some undergarments with a catchy slogan too.
Ah Walter: again, your response lives up to the promise of your surname…..