You’ve heard of tabloid media going after thick sheiks. Now some are even using fake sheiks.
At about 2pm yesterday my office received a message to call someone from Radio 2GB, home to such leading lights of quality journalism as Alan Jones. I called back and spoke to a female who worked with Jason Morrison. She wondered if I knew much about a certain Sheik Haron who had apparently been charged by Federal Police after sending abusive letters to the families of Australian soldiers killed in action in Afghanistan. She wanted to know if I’d be prepared to speak to Morrison on his afternoon Drive Show. I agreed.
Silly me. Morrison seemed less interested in Haron and more interested in why a group of people he described as “Moozlems” didn’t step forward to condemn the man. He wanted to know why he was having so much difficulty getting “Moozlems” to condemn this man on his program (I did remind him that many don’t listen to 2GB). Still he pressed the point about the alleged Muslim conspiracy of silence over Haron.
I said Haron hadn’t been given a huge amount of airplay or coverage (and I wasn’t just talking about the allegedly left-wing trendy “multi-culty”, the Fairfax press and ABC either). Maybe your average Aussie who ticked the Muslim box on his or her census form didn’t see the need to comment on some sheik who, by all accounts (including those of Richard Kerbaj in The Australian in January last year), was little more than a fake.
Even Jeremy Jones, of the Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), was quoted in one Jewish blog as saying that Haron “works alone and has no support”.
And yet somehow fake-sheik Haron was an issue that one journalist described to Kevin Rudd at a press conference yesterday as “the question that’s dominating talkback radio today”. Rudd ended his response to the journalist’s question with: “You know, when you pick up the front page of the Tele today, I think people, I think their stomachs turn.”
The journalist asked Rudd whether he would consider changing Australia’s citizenship laws to allow “someone like that” (like what? Fake-sheik? Iranian? Crazy dude in a turban? Migrant?) to have their citizenship stripped of them and be deported. Rudd was non-committal.
It’s one thing for media outlets to use the rants of a thick sheik to cook up a divisive broth of dog whistles. But why use the imbecilic correspondence of a fake sheik to cast aspersions on 360,000 people, most of whom (including their religious leaders) have never heard of him?
After my interview with Morrison, I telephoned his researcher and asked whether the show had any trouble finding a Muslim to talk on the show. She confirmed that she hadn’t called an Islamic council, an imam, a board of imams or the Community Relations Commission. She did say that Morrison may have tried calling other people about the matter.
He may have. But I somehow doubt it.
You’re better not even to engage with the dribbling morons on talkback radio. All you do is help them manufacture outrage for a brain dead, ignorant and paranoid superannuated audience looking for any excuse to fulminate about why all these non-blond non-freckled people are running around in their midst. I’m most disappointed, yet again, in Rudd. After the Ozcar beat-up and dozens of other prefabricated outrages in the Terror, why does he bother even responding?
Like Mr Denmore, I guess the only response I have is, why go on the show? As you say Irfan, 2GB is home to Alan Jones….nuff said. Leave them to their banal obsession with terrorists and refugees – the discussion they engage you in won’t be rational and you’ll wind up confused as to why they asked you on in the first place!
If you don’t go on the show, you don’t win. If you go on, you don’t win.
I guess I wanted to experience for myself the processes used by this kind of media. It was an experience.
Where’s your condemnation, Yusuf? This depicable act should be condemned by all.
Where’s yours, Bakerboy? Should we interpret your silence as evidence that you are a follower of Sheik Haron? Are you a member of the Taliban?