As if the COP15 participants weren’t doing a good enough job already, the climate change sceptics have been out in force at Copenhagen working hard to undermine the climate change summit during its opening days.
While the COP15 is taking place in the drab Bella Centre, as big and as aesthetically pleasing as an airport terminal, the sceptics have held their “summit” in a small flat in Christianshavn — a clever choice for a group of unorthodox thinkers given it is home to a self-proclaimed autonomous community of squatters and hippies.
Upon arrival, a hand-written sign sticky-taped next to the front door directs you to the event, officially named the “Copenhagen Climate Change Challenge”. A colourful sticker on the ground reads “hurra global warming [sic]” and shows a red-headed Eskimo standing on a melting ice-cap with a seagull in one hand and an ice-cream in the other (don’t ask).
The walls of the tiny room where the 50-odd sceptics gather are almost invisible behind the mass of rococo artworks: squint and you could be in the Louvre. “We are certainly small in quantity, but what we lack in numbers we make up for in quality,” boasts Christopher Monckton, chairman of the event and former adviser to Margaret Thatcher.
Buoyed by the recent release of the stolen Climate-gate emails, the sceptics are in fine spirits — one of the gatherings says their struggle is the 21st century equivalent of Galileo’s attempts to disprove the Catholic Church’s claim that the Earth was the centre of the universe.
Australian Ian Plimer, geologist and author of Heaven and Earth, is one of the stars and despite initial doubts — “What is Crikey doing at an event like this?” — agrees to answer some questions on COP15 and the Senate’s rejection of the Rudd government’s ETS:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0LmwuGnUX0[/youtube]
Solar radiation and volcanic activity are possible culprits for global warming, Plimer argues. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, is “… not a pollutant, it is plant food”.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e-zhEnS06U[/youtube]
Attending the Copenhagen Climate Change Challenge is to enter a parallel universe, a 100% irony-neutral zone.
The East Anglia professors — “Let’s sue for fraud!” — are pilloried for manipulating evidence to prove their hypothesis. But no one bats an eyelid when UK lawyer and businessman Stewart Wheeler says: “Maybe what I am about to say is not completely accurate but it’ll make the point I hope.”
At the conclusion of Wheeler’s talk, chairman Christopher Monckton lauds him for speaking up for the “common man on the bus”. Then he remarks, no pun intended: “I know where your castle is.” Turns out Wheeler is a multimillionaire who had enough spare change lying around in 2001 to donate £5 million towards the Conservative Party election campaign.
The speakers pat themselves on their backs for their “evidence-based” and “apolitical” presentations. Yet politics, of a distinctly right-of-centre variety, dominates the conference. Several of the participants boast of their membership of the anti-European Union UK Independence Party.
Professor Plimer says that not only do Al Gore and algae sound alike: “They are both scum.”
The suggestion that mankind should be demonising water rather than co2, given that 300 Americans drown in their bathtubs each year, is greeted by the reply: “I’m sure the 300 are all Democrats.”
And as scepticism is the flavour of the alternative conference it’s perhaps also worth noting that organiser of the event, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow think-tank, received $582,000 between 1998 and 2007 from ExxonMobil.
Surely Crikey can do better than this. It’s typical ad hominem rubbish. We know the sceptics don’t help themselves by their quaint right wing fringe indulgences, but when you take the time and effort to seriously examine what they’re saying they make a great deal of sense.
Peter Donoughe, bullsh*t.
ad hominem rubbish? The fact that these people are (a) bat-shit crazy and (b) sponsored by ExxonMobil is precisely the kind of information we non-experts need to assess the credibility of what they’re saying.
“The East Anglia professors — “Let’s sue for fraud!” — are pilloried for manipulating evidence to prove their hypothesis. But no one bats an eyelid when UK lawyer and businessman Stewart Wheeler says: “Maybe what I am about to say is not completely accurate but it’ll make the point I hope.” – God help us, if you can’t see the difference between Professional climate change experts possibly manipulating the figures to prove their case, and a multimillionaire business expressing views from outside his area of expertise, then you better withdraw from the debate.
I am so sick and tired of hearing the line: CO2 is not pollution it is plant food!
Let’s think about it. Of course it is what plants absorb, (and they in turn make Oxygen – good for us humans).
But think about it. We are cutting down more and more of the earths plants every day. And we are populating faster and faster at the same time. So the plants that can use the extra CO2 are diminishing in number and the people who produce the CO2 are growing in number.
It is not hard to follow: there comes a point when there is more CO2 than the existing plants need. And we will also reach a point when there are not enough plants for the number of people and all other oxygen breathing creatures, on the earth as well. (And if volcanic activity and sun activity are adding even more CO2 into our atmosphere, then we really should be concerned.)
So the simplistic and naive statement about CO2 being plant food is just a red herring. A stupid one-liner from the skeptics and deniers camp.