Dear Mainstream Media
Feeling better now, are we? Finished your raging about the Government? Or does there yet remain some spleen unvented about “insulation debacles”, “bungling Ministers” and of course those four deaths that you couldn’t care less about but that provide such a handy hook for efforts to bring our highhanded, manipulative and arrogant Prime Minister down a notch or two?
We’ve now advanced well into “Having It Both Ways” territory. The story has switched to companies and workers displaced by the decision to overhaul the program. Having howled for the program to be shut down, the media and the Opposition can now decry the consequences of, um, shutting it down. On Newcastle radio this morning I was asked about Bob Baldwin criticising the Government for closing the program and putting people out of work. I had to point out that if Baldwin and his Coalition mates had had their way, no company would ever have employed anyone in the first place because the program would never have existed.
Nor, for that matter, would the standards and accreditation regime now in place that has made the insulation industry far safer than it used to be. Although I suspect it won’t be that long before the media starts running stories about how the new, heavy-handed regulations on insulation installation are forcing ordinary Aussies out of their jobs.
“It’s a bloody shemozzle,” an angry small businessman will declare. “There’s as much paperwork for each house as there are batts.”
Give that one time — it’ll eventually emerge.
And then there’s the commentator this morning who suggested Mossad’s forging of Australian passports had been another distraction used by Kevin Rudd, suggesting either that Rudd should have ignored it, or that the Prime Minister has a remarkable capacity to influence world events for his own short-term political ends. Hopefully he consulted with the Jewish lobby first, because the latter have been embarrassed into an uncharacteristic silence by their Government’s antics.
The latest example of having it both ways is that Kevin Rudd — notoriously the worst micro-manager in the world, and subject to a steady stream of media criticism about how his urge to control is strangling the Government — apparently didn’t micro-manage this program enough and ought to have demanded continual briefings about it and intervened to guarantee that no one in an entire industry acted illegally or with poor judgement.
Still, the media drew blood last night with Rudd admitting, in uncharacteristically plain language, to being disappointed with himself to Kerry O’Brien. O’Brien, who was embarrassingly ill-informed about the meaning of the Minter Ellison report and convinced it was some sort of smoking gun, had spent the preceding 10 minutes demanding answers of Rudd and then, when the Prime Minister had the effrontery to actually provide them, angrily demanding different answers, ones that presumably involved Rudd donning sackcloth and ashes and flogging himself through every ceiling in the country.
We also had an extensive display of that special O’Brien pause that Malcolm Turnbull pinged last year, where O’Brien asks a question, pauses long enough to invite his interlocutor to answer, before cutting them off mid-sentence to make a further inquiry that may or may not relate to the previous question. It’s a pause that, far from refreshing, seems designed to trip up interviewees, unless you’re Turnbull and take to asking O’Brien if he’s finished talking and you can have a go now.
But sackcloth and ashes is eventually what he got.
The media’s pursuit of this issue has been more about payback for Rudd than about the facts, which have been studiously ignored in a welter of critical adjectives and blithe assertions of incompetence and guilt. And there’s more than a little justice in this. Rudd and his team have taken media manipulation to a higher level than ever before seen in Australian politics, and upset a very great many journalists in the process. That they’ve spent the past fortnight trying to cope with the media manipulating them is hardly unjust. What goes around comes around, and they’ve discovered they have no goodwill to fall back on in the gallery. No one is feeling a shred of sympathy for Rudd and nor should they.
Question is, has this episode exhausted the media’s long-frustrated desire to give Rudd a shellacking, or is it the start of more permanent phase of press hostility?
I agree with your analysis of the media’s treatment of this matter but the Government must also take some responsibility for the way it attempts to manage its media profile. Am I alone in thinking that Rudd et al are pretty woeful at it? Witness the Government’s ETS pitch, for example. About the only time we seem to see the PM on the TV or radio is when hes reacting to something and then he presents like a defensive bureaucrat. He seems to have real problems communicating any “narrative” on a human level through the mass media. Unfortunately, much of the front bench are not much better. These guys really need to work on their communications skills, regardless of the “programatic specificity” of any particular issue at hand.
Jeez! Rudd’s at the beginning of the end.
The most psychopahantic media Rudd apologist after Keane aka the Red Peril gave him a grilling for the first time ever last night.
Next it’ll be Grattan or the oleaginous Oakes…..
What you didnt mention Bernard is the fact that Rudd’s mea-culpa had all the sincerity of sound bite rehearsed and road tested for maximum electoral impact.
If Rudd wasn’t such an insipid media manipulator he would have had the balls to defend both Garret and his government from the barrage of bullshit that has been thrown by the media over this non issue.
You got the feeling his one feeble attempt at correcting O’brien re the Minter Ellison report was due to the fact that one of his pimply faced underlings had read Possum’s expose in yesterdays Crikey – rather than any kind of substantive analysis on his part.
THe guy is just not concerned with ‘the truth’ of things. As an arch bureaucrat – its the process that matters. Lying down and playing dead as he did last night was about ‘managing’ the issue in accordance with the laws of political charlatanism and spin. Yeah, he spoke in plain english but he was still talking bullshit.
Kerry O’brien last night was just downright embaressing as well. So we had the spectacle of a poorly informed self righteous O’brien talking absolute crap confronting a gratuitously contrite PM acting out a pantemine of contrition in accordance with some pathetic PR campaign worked out in his office.
It was a sad commentary on how abjectly miserable the Australian political debate has become.
Jeeze Bernard, bit tough on the media…’4 deaths you couldn’t care less about’….talk about your blithe generalisations…there’s actually a few of them in your article…however do agree that the media is ramping up the anti-labour rhetoric for the election….thank God for Barnaby…although he’s had a dream run with media so far
Sean…you don’t like Rudd that’s bleedin’ obvious, but man up against the press…are you kidding, they were copping a hiding on this…and having balls or not wouldn’t have helped, the media was baying for blood and the truth wasn’t getting the way…
Pete
Yeah, I can’t stomach Rudd, but i think of him as the only barrier between some degree of potlical sanity and a long term relationship with a lunatic ex monk. So I’m not against him in terms of the political contest.
There’s a difference between cravenly rolling over in insipid fashion like Rudd did last night and acknowledging community concern etc while at the same time offering some basic defence of yourself vis-a-vis the facts of the matter. Keating, even Howard had some cursory instinct to defend themselves against ignorance and bullshit. Rudd doesn’t – and thats a pretty disturbing thing.
If you take the media management course you just end up with governance by spin and PR flackery. WHich is not far from what we’ve got now.