Opposition leader Tony Abbott kept himself racing through the headlines all weekend, as the media breathlessly tracked his progress as a pink-lycra-clad competitor in the grueling Ironman Australia Triathlon.

ironman

A blatant stunt? Perhaps. But did the nation and the pundits buy into it?

In Saturday’s Australian, Paul Kelly worried whether too much time in the budgie smugglers and not enough time in a suit could damage his credibility as a potential PM… or was it all part of a grander PR plan?

Might Abbott win kudos by publicising a retreat in his fitness regime for more time in a suit?

But the paper’s op-ed that day argued he could wear both costumes without conflict, and today, Caroline Overington paints a fairly gushing image of Abbott’s superhuman efforts.

In the Sydney Morning Herald, Damain Murphy declares the stunt a “win” for Abbott, but Phillip Coorey is also asking whether hours spent outside the office on physical pursuits is the best counterpoint to cultivate against Kevin Rudd’s image as a workaholic.

Tony Wright took a similar line in Saturday’s The Age, saying the “authenticity” of Abbott’s sporting endeavors would play well with voters, but he needed to tone it down.

In Sunday’s Daily Telegraph, Malcolm Farr suggested the pink lycra might help him earn the “pink vote”, Simon Kearney labeled him an “elite athlete”, while Sue Dunlevy claimed his “Mad Monk” moniker had been replaced with “Ironman Abbott”.

In today’s Courier Mail, Dennis Atkins applauds Abbott’s efforts, and criticises the government for criticising them.

Today’s Herald Sun is probably cheering the loudest, with an editorial declaring Abbott as a role model, and that exercise helps politicians “generate ideas and sharpen wits”.

So how did it work for you? Has Abbott’s marathon effort earned him some new respect, or will the image of sweaty pink lycra clinging to his 52-year-old buttocks haunt you forever?