The government turning the screws on the cigarette companies with increased taxes and plain packaging takes me back to the three years in the mid-1990s in which I worked for a cigarette company in Brisbane. I began in early 1994 as a graduate.
Ordinarily, perhaps I may have been reluctant to work for a tobacco company, but Australia was then suffering from the effects of Keating’s recession we had to have, and so I was happy just to find work. And also, I was already a part-time smoker anyway, so I didn’t really have any philosophical objections. At least, I didn’t to begin with.
On day one, walking in to the company’s office/warehouse complex, the first thing I noticed inside was the atmosphere. This was in the days before smoking became banned in the workplace, restaurants, bars and just about every other public place you care to mention. Back then, it was open slather and this cigarette company wasn’t for wasting the opportunity.
On seemingly every flat surface was an ashtray, and above each of these ashtrays was a little hexagonal yellow sign that said: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SMOKE. The staff seemed to have taken this entreaty to heart, too, because almost all of them had a cigarette in the mouths or smouldering in one of the ashtrays dotted around their workstations. To say that a rank miasma pervaded the place would be an egregious understatement.
On my first pay day, I was stunned when I was asked what sort of cigarettes I would like. You see, not only did the tobacco company encourage its staff to smoke, but it also gave them an allocation of “free” cigarettes every month to assist them in their corporate duty.
Every month, I would receive 500 cigarettes — increased to 600 when I was promoted to marketing analyst — for my own personal use (about three cartons).
Unfortunately, staff were not allowed to sell these cigarettes and, indeed, anyone caught trying to sell them was liable to be summarily dismissed. You had to either smoke them yourself or give them away. Five hundred cigarettes is a lot to give away. I would find my friends pleading with me not to give them cigarettes as they, like me, were trying to give up. Some of them began calling me the “cancer-man”.
The cigarette company’s generosity didn’t end with its staff. They also had a “gratis” list, or list of people to whom they would merrily deliver free cigarettes each month.
The people on this list comprised the “A” list of Queensland decision makers and influence peddlers, everyone from politicians, mayors, judges, QCs, leading public servants, actors and other significant or influential people across the state.
At the time, as a lowly accounts assistant, I thought the company did this because they were just being nice. Who knows, maybe this is how the recipients of this patronage pass it off? However, now it seems obvious that the goal was, first, to keep these powerful figures hooked on nicotine and, secondly, grateful towards the tobacco industry such that they would consider long and hard before making any decisions that might negatively impact upon these concerns.
It would be interesting to know if the gratis list still exists.
What we do know is that cigarette companies are some of the most significant donors to political parties on the conservative side of politics. This makes Tony Abbott’s decision to support Kevin Rudd’s plain packaging legislation brave and praiseworthy.
Before people leap to the tobacco industry’s defence and complain about the government damaging copyright by enforcing plain packaging restrictions, which have been shown to have an effect, especially on people attempting to quit smoking, they should be aware that cigarette companies are well aware of the addictive and dangerous nature of their products.
More than that, they are quite willing to use whatever means are at their disposal to keep people either addicted to their product or dependent upon their largesse.
David, thanks very much for posting this account. From time to time, former employees of the tobacco industry now suffering from tobacco caused disease try to seek redress from their former employers. Their argument is that they were strongly encouraged to smoke as a part of their job. I will never forget one poor man who came to see me. He had such bad emphysema it took him maybe four times the normal time it takes a healthy person to climb one flight of stairs to my office. He than had to recover for some time before talking. His job required him to go to events like race meetings, to observe smokers using competitors’ brands and then approach them offering free samples. The routine was that he had to light one himself and then light the other punter’s free cigarette. He went through dozens a day. It was part of his job to put his health at risk. He was fed oceans of B.S. in staff seminars about it only being an “idea” that smoking was harmful. I believe he got a big out-of-court settlement. There are many similar cases, some of whom will be getting such diseases annually as time progresses.
Your experience could be invaluable in legal testimony in such cases. If you would like to contact me, I will put you in contact with some legal firms. My email is sc[a.t]med.usyd.edu.au
It is illuminating to read David Donovan’s account.
Bearing in mind the hordes of former tobacco industry employees, I am mystified why there are so few whistle-blowers. Perhaps some feel a sense of shame for their part in this heinous drug business, perhaps others are prematurely dead.
One can never feel sorry for the tobacco corporations and they personify, as much as any group, the definition of corporations as being psychopathic by nature.
those who deserve our sympathy however are the tobacco on low or minimum wages or benefits, who are addicted to tobacco. As an ex smoking addict myself, I know only too well that nothing comes before your addiction, and as so many poor people are now experiencing, their is an agony in deciding to buy highly priced tobacco products before food or clothing for children. Thats the way it is folks. Perhaps we could work out a way to issue free tobacco products to the poor in order to ensure that their children get fed.
I’m still waiting for cigarettes to be scheduled on the poisons register. According to the Quit Line, “tobacco smoke contains over 4,000 different chemicals. At least 50 are known carcinogens (cause cancer in humans) and many are poisonous.”
Schedule 7 of the poisons register seems to apply: “Poisons which require special precautions in manufacture, handling, storage or use, or special individual regulations regarding labelling or availability.”
lets see if these get a run. smoke free, spit free product diversification from the RJ Reynolds folks:
https://snus.tobaccopleasure.com/
currently outlawed in Australia, however increasingly available in USA