A botched $8.4 million software upgrade in Western Australia public hospitals has left radiology departments in chaos, delivering false patient X-ray results and constant crashes.
Radiologist and imaging software blogger Doctor Dalai reported on the saga last Thursday, after a barrage of complaints from radiologists in WA. A source inside WA Health confirmed to Crikey a “dramatic impairment” in hospital procedure.
Dalai reported a litany of problems with the PACS software: unacceptable system down time, images that don’t match patient names and/or records, left-right reversed mammograms and non-chronological previous case lists, and processing slowdowns so severe that a Code Yellow — signifying a failure of essential services — was declared across all WA hospitals, including a hold on all new admissions and elective surgeries.
The WA Health source said the system failures impacted radiology departments across all public hospitals.
“Efficiency has been dramatically reduced, with departments now unable to cope with their daily workloads, and patient exposed to significant risk due to missed or delayed diagnosis,” they report.
“The unfortunate local PACS support staff at hospitals have been forced to bear the brunt of the anger and frustration of medical staff who are unable to do their job. In the current status, the system is basically not usable. I am aware of a number of staff who would be prepared to resign of this is not addressed.”
Kim Snowball, acting director-general of WA Health, admitted there are “problems”. The bureaucracy is “working closely” with the software manufacturer to iron out the bugs.
“We have also increased our in-house technical support for this software implementation and it is expected that all remaining issues will be resolved soon,” Snowball told Crikey.
“Radiology staff and doctors sometimes have to use alternative methods to view and report on images while the issues with the new system are being addressed. Studies continue to be prioritised with urgent cases being attended to promptly. When the technical difficulties are overcome it is expected that the upgraded PACS software will significantly out-perform the previous version.”
According to Dalai, this isn’t the start of problems with radiology software for Western Australia, with a previous implementation of the same product — IMPAX by AGFA — being so broken that practitioners resorted to bringing in private copies of a competing product in order to read images from private imaging clinics.
IT departments were unhappy, citing flimsy system robustness and warranty excuses, and deleted the competing software. After radiologists began carrying copies of the working software on USB sticks, one unnamed hospital threatened disciplinary action. Eventually, separate computers had to be bought.
“In a number of cases, the individual departments had to pay for these additional machines themselves,” said the insider.
“Before now, doctors in the hospital were in the ironic position where they could instantaneously, directly, access secure patient images and reports from non-government imaging services from pretty much anywhere with an internet connection, except inside public hospitals.”
The new version of AGFA’s software was chosen via restricted tender by WA Health’s Health Information Network — awarded to AGFA Healthcare Oceania, the existing provider. Why HIN decided to return to, and even expand, the reach of an unpopular product is unclear, with reports of input from radiologists in the decision being excluded or discounted.
Snowball told Crikey that “the existing investment in both processes and systems played a key part in the decision at the time”.
Meanwhile, Dalai reported that one of his readers tried to access his blog — the only source of information on the failure — from inside the public hospital network only to be greeted by the following message:
Access to the web site you requested has been restricted
The site you have attempted to access has been identified as inappropriate or unrelated to Department of Health business. All internet access is recorded and regularly reviewed by Department of Health accountability personnel.
If you require access to this site for Department of Health business, please contact your line manager to request access. All requests for access to this site will be reviewed by the State Health Executive Forum.
The Acceptable Use of Computing Facilities policy in question includes nothing that would warrant the banning of a blog on a work-related topic — unless WA Health believes that the blog “otherwise interferes in the proper operation of WA Health computer services” or perhaps could “expose WA Health to potential litigation”? Snowball suggests Dalai is the victim of a blanket ban.
“The WA Health IT network policy blocks access to sites which have been identified as inappropriate or unrelated to WA Health business. This includes social media sites, and popular blogging sites such as Blogspot and Livejournal. Where access to restricted sites can be justified for work purposes, staff may apply to be given access,” he said.
“Why HIN decided to return to, and even expand, the reach of an unpopular product is unclear, with reports of input from radiologists in the decision being excluded or discounted.”
This stinks to high heaven of corruption.
Kim Snowball? Surely that’s a fake name. The problems have snowballed and rather than take sensible measures to fix problems and restore the system, bureaucrats are just snowballing each other.
So many inaccuracies in this report that I can’t even list them all.
1. The new version was not chosen by restricted tender … it was an upgrade to an existing product. The restricted tender was for installing PACS across WA rural hospitals, ie leveraging off metropolitan system. This has not happened yet.
2. 8.4 million is also rubbish as this refers to the rural tender
3. Private practice software claim is wrong. It is a web based application that required authorisation to go outside of WA Health firewall. This was not deemed acceptable on PACS workstations as they are quarantined from the internet as a medical device. Radiologist installing the viewer on PACS workstations were putting whole of PACS (including the scanners) at risk to virus and malicious attack.
4. Dr Dalai’s blog is not blocked at all and never was. Commenting on it is though …
5. PACS in metro hospitals has always been owned by the Radiology departments . The radiologists (not the only users) are represented by an executive sponsor who is a radiologist. Anyone who claims otherwise is lying.
6. HIN (IT) have had very little to do with PACS … that is a large part of the problem.
Please make an attempt at balanced reporting in the future …
I bet DeadMeat works for HIN. Had a chat with some of my radiologists friends.
– “It is a web based application that required authorisation to go outside of WA Health firewall” – WRONG !
– “PACS workstations as … are quarantined from the internet as a medical device” – WRONG !
– “putting whole of PACS (including the scanners) at risk to virus and malicious attack” – WRONG !
No wonder the radiologists don’t want you touching their PACS systems ! You haven’t got a clue.
If you ever actually met a surgeon trying to operate on an emergency blindly with no access to imaging because the hospital PACS is a dog, and external imaging is arbitrarily disallowed by some uncontactable IT twerp sitting in another part of the city, you may actually learn something about health care.
Maybe I could log another Support request with HIN and see if it gets answered before 2014!
Ahhh Orthochick … so angry? I don’t work for HIN but I do know a LOT about HIN and Radiology departments having worked with both.
You say I am wrong based on discussions with the radiologists? That is highly laughable.
– the application is JAVA … for those of you who don’t know that is web-based!! It is a thin client with some installation of specific java components.
– again you are misinformed … the PACS workstations are considered a medical device and are in at least one hospital I know of on the same medLAN with the CT, MRI etc. The PACS powers-that-be (radiologist led group) made the decision to cut all internet access for the workstations for this purpose. Some of your radiologist mates then entered proxies to enable access to the internet against express instruction … hmmm
– this is also a true statement. The antivirus software on the workstations was not always up-to-date and also the operating system was not patched. If anyone knows Windows XP/2000 they know it has a lot of security holes.
Soooo. … orthochick take your angry maligned commments elsewhere and get your facts straight first. Oh and by the way I have met that surgeon and fixed his issue …