Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.
comments-section
Subscribe
Please sign in to comment
37 Comments
Most voted
NewestOldest
Inline feedbacks
View all comments
SBH
14 years ago
As a close relative of the bonobo, I must point out that it is a kind of ape, not a kind of monkey. Otherwise very funny
Steve P
14 years ago
Yea, and that looks nothing like a bonobo either. And what happened to your latin names? Pan paniscus.
Sandshoe
14 years ago
This cartoon is 4 of one and 6 of the other. Borders doesn’t add up.
Mike Jones
14 years ago
Since quite a lot of the heavy lifting for the blog is done by the fair and independently-minded commenters, I think it’s only reasonable that the gifty technologies for evaluative purposes flow outwards in the general direction of we.
While we’re there, what kind of inducement might be expected to be proffered for a walk on part in the ‘toon. I mean if a Deputy Editor can get a ringing inducement, I’m up for a bonehead part standing behind Joe Hockey guffawing when he does his version of fiscalibriality.
Sandshoe
14 years ago
insert ‘about’ between “is” and “4”. Darn.
wpDiscuz
Send to their inbox
The parable of The Cartoonist, The Primate and the Tawdry Inducement
As a close relative of the bonobo, I must point out that it is a kind of ape, not a kind of monkey. Otherwise very funny
Yea, and that looks nothing like a bonobo either. And what happened to your latin names? Pan paniscus.
This cartoon is 4 of one and 6 of the other. Borders doesn’t add up.
Since quite a lot of the heavy lifting for the blog is done by the fair and independently-minded commenters, I think it’s only reasonable that the gifty technologies for evaluative purposes flow outwards in the general direction of we.
While we’re there, what kind of inducement might be expected to be proffered for a walk on part in the ‘toon. I mean if a Deputy Editor can get a ringing inducement, I’m up for a bonehead part standing behind Joe Hockey guffawing when he does his version of fiscalibriality.
insert ‘about’ between “is” and “4”. Darn.