From the deep north, we report that the government in is diabolical trouble.
Not only do they not like Kevin Rudd’s Great Big New Tax (54%, according to the Galaxy poll) they don’t understand it (68% say the government has explained in badly) and they don’t want to (anecdotal evidence). As a result the coalition is now clearly in front — 52 to 48 on two-party preferred.
But the truly grim news is that Tony Abbott has caught up with Rudd in the preferred Prime Minister stakes, trailing by a single point — 44 to 45. Labor’s fallback position has always been that their guy might be pretty much on the nose, but the other guy is unelectable — too crazy to take seriously in the top job.
The theory, now revealed as little more than wishful thinking, has been that while the voters might find the idea of the Mad Monk a bit of a distraction, something to brighten up the daily spin-driven tedium that politics has become, when it came to actually casting a vote they would draw back; caution and discretion would take over. It now appears that in Queensland — Rudd’s home state — the punters are preparing to forget about the parachute and jump out of the plane.
Admittedly this is Queensland, the state that gave Joh Bjelke-Petersen, Russ Hinze, Clive Palmer and the cane toad. But where Queensland goes, can Western Australia be far behind? And if the dominoes start to fall, suddenly we will wake up to find Abbott in the Lodge, Joe Hockey in the Treasury, Julie Bishop running foreign policy, Phillip Ruddock, Bronwyn Bishop and Kevin Andrews running ministries and Barnaby Joyce — the shadow finance minister who had to take off his trousers to count up to 21 — naming his own price for keeping the Nationals in the coalition.
The prospect, once the stuff of febrile nightmare, is rapidly turning real. And the truly bad news is that no one in the Labor camp seems to have a clue what to do about it.
In the circumstances the workers should be very grateful to Fair Work Australia and the $26 a week catch-up award for the lowest paid, which came through last week.
Under a coalition government there would not be too many like it. Abbott, in his Mr Nice Guy mode, assured the honest toilers that he was never one to begrudge them a rise — but he only hoped it would not be a case of one man’s rise being another man’s job, the usual code for the employers’ line that it is never actually the right time for a wage rise — in good times they cause inflation, in bad times they add to unemployment.
With the unions stepping up their own campaigning against the miners and the coalition, it is likely that industrial relations will play more a part in the forthcoming election than either side had anticipated. Labor was always going to use the line about Abbott planning to bring back WorkChoices as part of its scare campaign. But it now looks as though the unions, realising that a change of government is suddenly a real possibility, are going to get back on the airwaves in a big way.
Frankly it’s just as well; so far the government’s advertising campaign extolling the RSPT has been even more boring and unconvincing than the miners’ campaign against it — and given that all the facts and logic are on the government’s side, that is condemnation indeed.
At least the backlash against Rudd’s broken promise on this aspect of the campaign has been less severe than might have been expected; Abbott and his colleagues have had a bit of fun with the apparent invocation of a national emergency, but by and large the public seems to have shrugged it off.
As Rudd and other have pointed out, Howard did much worse and much more of it and in the current mood of disillusionment and despair at the whole process, that is all that needs to be said. All politicians are bastards, a politician is an a-se upon which everything has sat except a man, and whoever you vote for a politician always gets in, so why bother?
This public reversion to cynicism about politics and its place in society is perhaps the very worst legacy Rudd could leave Australia, but seems highly likely he will do so. His election campaign and the first year if his government did a lot to restore the hope and trust that Howard had so badly eroded; but in the past few months he has p-ssed it all away in favour of timidity, indecision and, of course, a sack full of broken promises.
Part of the problem is the group of time-servers, mercenaries and mug lairs he has collected around him; mainly refugees from the New South Wales right, they are ignorant of the past (it’s irrelevant), uninformed about the present (they only talk to each other) and uninterested in the future (it doesn’t go past the next Newspoll.) But it is Rudd himself who has been the most crashing disappointment: Kevin 07 has melted in to Kevin Zilch.
What a pity Barack Obama again has been forced to cancel his visit; it would have been nice to see a real politician, if only from a distance.
Yes, but apart from two wrongs not making a right, the key difference is that Rudd made a big show of promising not to.
Mungo obviously means Mark Ahbib and Karl Bitar when he says “Part of the problem is the group of time-servers, mercenaries and mug lairs he has collected around him; mainly refugees from the New South Wales right”.
It is an enduring mystery to those of us not inside the loop of intra-party politics how such people acquire reputations as brilliant and great strategic thinkers etc. Especially given that presumably they must take a lot of the blame for the current state of the NSW Labor party. They must have Machiavellian powers to manoeuvre their men into positions of power within the party but why would Rudd value that when he sits at the top? And in the long run (actually relatively short run) the results are unarguably so awful.
Ahbib is not stupid but equally his appearances on the likes of Q&A have not revealed him as a profound thinker or exceptional speaker/wit/etc. Bob Carr mark II he is not. And once again we see Lindsay Tanner on the correct side of the arguments but on the wrong side of the decisions and party strategy.
Another post from an ‘old leftie’ that thinks just in terms of Labor vs Coalition.
The polls say that today, for every two Labor voters, there is now one Green. The public are starting to wake up to an alternative, an alternative that many ‘old lefties’ are working hard to ignore.
I’m sure that old party loyalties would never let things go this far – but on many issues we are at the the stage where both Fraser and Whitlam could vote Green. (Has anyone actually asked them how they would vote?)
@WMH: Without having any inside knowledge, I’d imagine Mr Whitlam would vote Labor (but preference Green in the Senate, particularly). Mr Fraser I don’t think would vote green: DLP, perhaps (as Menzies did in 1969)?
I agree with all of it. The NSW Right is worse than a waste of space, it’s downright detrimental. It w ould be nice to see someone in Labor with guts enough to argue for a progressive platform instead of leaving it all to the Greens.