Labor strategists apparently want Kevin Rudd — failed leader; potential rat — back on the campaign trail. The vanquished prime minister’s journalist-of-choice Peter Hartcher writes today of the ALP’s “desperate plea”.
That’s how bad this election campaign has become. Even Rudd looks like a positively colourful intervention.
And then there’s Bob Hawke, on the hustings in red-blooded Lindsay yesterday, stealing all the thunder from Labor candidate David Bradbury. As Bernard Keane writes from Sydney today: “Perhaps it’s nostalgia for a simpler age, a time when politicians were real leaders.”
Certainly none of those in this campaign.
How did we get here? Gillard’s smart and sassy, as good a parliamentary speaker as any, presumably with more complexity to her belief in the ‘fair go’ than she’s letting on. Abbott is engaged and genuinely engaging — with a book-full of personal narrative and political belief. There’s enough different about Tony and Julia, and enough common ground, to inspire a worthy debate of ideas.
Yet Labor reaches for its yesterday’s heroes. And the Liberals talk about knife-crime.
Keane reports the good people of Penrith have tuned out — if in fact they were ever tuned in. Both sides have nobody to blame but themselves.
It’s funny that Labor released a policy on knife-crime without expecting to be ridiculed by the media for being the perpetrators of knifing Rudd.
That (party machines) and a media of prima donnas itching to play “whack-a-mole”, for their own blind amusement – reckon Howard would have received this sort of disrespect, or an Abbott well ahead in the polls?
I am persuaded by Kim Sawyer’s comments in today’s The Age/SMH to the effect that:
“Elections tend to converge rather than change policy. Both parties converge to the position of certainty. They converge to the marginal voter. Substantive policy discussion is relegated until after the election, when it is safer, and to the parliamentary committees, where real policy is debated. Elections have become nearly policy irrelevant”, and that, “… principally, elections are not determined by policy. Rather they are contests as to who we expect to be the best manager for the risks ahead.”
(http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/campaign-trail-no-time-to-test-policies-that-matter-20100729-10×69.html)
Is this knife thing the start of a trend towards the Commonwealth taking over the state police, i.e. all the armed services in the country? Just dumb political expedience now, but if it results in state policing going the same way that taxation, industrial relations, transport, education, and hospitals are going, some future prime minister may end up with control of every armed service in the country.
Meantime, The Ruddster has again stolen the limelight from the two lacklustre party leaders. He’s just been admitted to The Mater Private Hospital in Brisbane for an emergency gall-bladder operation. Now he has the perfect excuse not to campaign for Gillard – despite his latest press release saying he’s willing to do so.