Keane’s Talking Points: hypocrisy over debates and smart education policy
It’s normal for political parties to undergo a cycle of hypocrisy as they move into and out of office on issues like election debates, of which prime ministers always want less and opposition leaders more. It’s altogether less normal for the parties to do so in the space of little over a week. It’s barely […]
article-article-body
- It’s normal for political parties to undergo a cycle of hypocrisy as they move into and out of office on issues like election debates, of which prime ministers always want less and opposition leaders more. It’s altogether less normal for the parties to do so in the space of little over a week. It’s barely nine days since Julia Gillard was waving away the need for more debates and Tony Abbott was whining about it. Now each has adopted the position of the other. A little hypocrisy goes a long way in politics.
- One of the reasons for the snarky reaction of the press gallery yesterday to ‘the real Julia Gillard’ is that it is, in short, a rejection of the national media’s role as primary interpreters of what is good and bad in politics. With journalists and editors unable to focus on policy for more than five seconds, or actively running vendettas against her, Gillard looks like taking a cue from both John Howard and, to a lesser extent Kevin Rudd, and shifting more attention to softer media like FM radio and tabloid TV. This will enable her to reach much bigger audiences than newspapers or specialist political broadcast media ever manage. But it always prompts bitching from the gallery about ‘dumbing down’ — something of which, of course, they’re never guilty.
- Getting rid of the baleful influence of NSW Labor on her campaign style might turn out to be a smart play by Gillard, but it’ll only be of any use if she goes all the way and removes the likes of Mark Arbib and Karl Bitar from the government’s policy process as well. That’s where the real damage has been done.
- Strangely missing from the media coverage of the Coalition’s looming changes to its PPL scheme is the word ‘backflip’. This has only come about because of Labor’s one campaign success — its conversion of the PPL levy into a ‘Coles and Woolies tax’ forced the Coalition into announcing a company tax cut and a reduction in the levy. That doesn’t change the fact that the Coalition scheme is still middle-class welfare, outrageously handing high-income earners huge amounts of taxpayers’ money.
- Terrible pity that Gillard’s proposal for what is in effect a pilot scheme for empowering principals has been announced during an election campaign — and one Labor looks destined to lose. It is that rare thing from this government — high-quality policy — and is a natural follow-on from the MySchools website, the next step in allowing the education sector to function more responsively and effectively. Maybe if we can get the teachers’ unions to come out against climate action, cuts in middle-class welfare and putting asylum seekers in perspective, Gillard will muscle up on those issues.
About the Author
Bernard Keane
Politics Editor @BernardKeane
Bernard Keane is Crikey's political editor. Before that he was Crikey's Canberra press gallery correspondent, covering politics, national security and economics.
who says julia gillard and labor is going to lose this election bernard? it aint over by a long way
i will give credit where credit is due and commend you on some of your articles well done, at least you do not appear to be biased
your comment on the dumbing down of journalists etc is more than that
never since i became politically aware have i seen a campaign that has been so biased against a government than this one, the last one was back in 1975 when gough whitlam was defeated
by and large this labor government has governed well, all be it with some mistakes
what we are witnessing, especially in the murdoch press is an attempted coup de tat conducted by that organisation aided an abetted by the right wing born to rule elite, big business, the mining companies etc etc . there stooges are tony abbott and his lackeys that make up the federal liberal party
but more importantly what it shows is the length that these people will go to get rid of a democratically elected government
it also shows is there hatred and contempt for people who choose to vote labor
the murdoch press, fairfax and even the abc have all exposed themselves to bias on a grand scale
i can not even imagine whats going on on sky news, i would not even lower myself to watch there coverage
Good point about the policy influence of NSW machine operators. NSW bedevilled Beazley, promoted and tore down Rudd, and are making Gillard look like a ventriloquist’s doll on a bad day.
The point about empowering principals is important from a different perspective. It reinforces the drive of the federal government, whoever holds office, to chase voters wherever they may be, regardless of constitutional responsibilities. In response state governments can do nothing, roll over, block or propose their own national solutions. The most active blocker and national policy proposer is Victoria. What Victoria does with the principals should have more power idea will be well worth watching.
The only possible upside of Labour losing this election will be a broad questioning of how the party came to be run by people of such low calibre.
Hailing from the “give me what I want and I’ll let you fuck my sister” school of political expediency, Mark Arbib’s poll driven panicky divide and conquer politics has been threatening to become a major liability for the ALP. I suspect Julia Gillard is reaching the same conclusion and is thus taking over her own campaign.
The less she listens to those self absorbed ball scratching boneheads down at Sussex Street, the better she will do in this campaign
In the long run, Labour must stop filling major leadership roles within the party machine with people whose primary motivation is only to enhance their own chances of getting pre selection.
@ BK…”has been announced during an election campaign — and one Labor looks destined to lose.” You care to elaborate Bernard. You know something we the great unwashed public, do not. Or is it merely a line to sex up your article? At the half way mark, I certainly do not get the feeling all is doom and gloom. Difficult yes, but Abbott is not over the line yet, regardless of the support the MSM are showering upon him.
BERNARD
Do detect a softer tone from you – bordering on melancholy?
Have you tossed in the towel already?
Where’s the faith bro?