This is Australia’s second climate change election.
So says John Hepburn on our Rooted blog today. He’s reading the tea leaves on the giant Greens gains and what they mean.
Meanwhile, Climate Spectator’s Giles Parkinson suggests the two main parties are still not listening:
“They speak and act as if the one fifth of the electorate who either voted for someone else, or who didn’t bother voting at all, holds no relevance, or did so because of ‘cabinet leaks’.”
Voters concerns on climate change might have a little something to do with it. But how can a hung parliament succeed in pursing any meaningful action on the issue when a newly elected Rudd government with an unprecedented mandate failed so spectacularly?
Government gridlock may not be any good for market signals for investment. But as Parkinson points out today, two of the three conservative independents have thought carefully about climate change (notable exception of Bob “crocodiles on the roof” Katter there) and all three support renewable and clean energy.
Insert newly elected member for Melbourne Adam Bandt into the mix (and maybe Andrew Wilkie) and we’ve got ourselves a conversation.
Cabinet leaks? ROFL. We voted like we did because *both* your policies sucked big time, in a number of areas.
Add another conversation starter? Crookes, WA. There could be 6 swinging and swaying Members in the House of Reps when next it sits, with the Lib/Nat factions being as low as 72 or 73. Who wants the Speaker’s Chair and allowances? Will a Green or two become Ministers? This is uncharted territory.
Take a look at the 14 or 15 highest “Informal” seats and the swings which took place in them:
All NSW.
All substantial swing to the Informal Party.
This cannot be an accident. The same electors in 2007 returned close to half as many informals, so the increase must be intentional.
I put it down to a mix of “A pox on all your houses”, “None of the Above” and the Latham factor.
I know several normally rusted-on ALP voters who didn’t give a toss about leaks but who were appalled at the treatment of Rudd. And insulted by promises of a citizens’ forum to address climate change policy.
Really, has the ALP hierarchy not learned a single lesson from this election result?