Refugee groups are urging the government to go further with its decision to allow children of asylum seekers to be released from detention, with the Greens pushing for the policy to be enshrined in law.
Under the plan, announced by Immigration Minister Chris Bowen yesterday, several hundred children and their families will be released from detention by next June, with charities and church groups expected to provide care and accommodation with the help of government funding. According to Immigration Department figures, there are currently 738 children in detention.
Bowen says the policy will be implemented using existing powers under the Migration Act to make “residence determinations”, which allows the minister to place conditions — such as curfews, requirements to live at a certain address and obligations to check in regularly with authorities — on those allowed to live in the community while they await the outcome of applications for asylum. According to the government, no legislation will be introduced or amended under the plan.
But while Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has supported the government’s move as a “welcome first step”, she also says the policy should be legislated: “This requires putting in place legal safeguards to protect children and young people. We can’t simply rely on the goodwill of a compassionate federal minister.”
Pamela Curr, campaign co-ordinator at the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre, agrees, telling Crikey more needs to be done to ensure children are never put back into detention.
“The minister has said they are using existing legislation to make this decision. From our point of view the legislation is clearly not strong enough when it can be used or not used at the government’s convenience,” Curr said.
Curr also points to legislation she says clearly states that children should not be placed in detention. According to section four of the Migration Act, amended by the Howard government in 2005, “a minor shall only be detained as a measure of last resort”.
“Australia is a country which has signed on to all the international conventions; our domestic legislation should reflect those promises that were made in good faith,” Curr said. “Our domestic legislation should not encompass weasel words which allow the government to choose which agreements they will honour and which they will not.”
David Manne, executive director at the Refugee and Immigration Legal Centre, says while the announcement is an important step it’s still necessary to lock any reform into law.
“One of the golden threads of our legal system is the legal right to be able to challenge to have one’s deprivation of liberty regulated by law, not discretion,” Manne told Crikey. “There’s no good reason why this shouldn’t apply to asylum seekers.”
Hanson-Young has made it clear the Greens will be moving in the Senate to amend the Migration Act, which will see children and unaccompanied minors exempt from the Act’s mandatory detention clause. In a statement yesterday, she also said that mandatory detention for adult asylum seekers needed to be addressed as well.
“The government is using existing powers put in place by the Howard government some years ago. We know how quickly moves to improve conditions for vulnerable asylum seekers can be reversed. The Greens will continue to pursue amendments to the Migration Act to exempt children and minors from the mandatory provisions, and set a time limit for the detention of adults.”
Curr agrees: “Until mandatory detention legislation is repealed our fight for the human rights of all asylum seekers is not over.”
The idiot notion this nation has had for the past 20 years that we have to jail anyone like this who can’t leave is and always has been utterly illegal and completely nuts to boot.
Two sets of racist trash, that is what the main parties are as they continue to send people to slaughter Afghans and then lock up the victims.
@SM – re “Two sets of racist trash, that is what the main parties are..” Could not agree more but as they both get nastier and more ridiculous daily based on the results of their ‘focus groups’, they think, and the great aussie population confirms rank racism and ill informed bigotry are winning the day.
Have to say, policy and general sentiment on this is almost tea-party like in it’s absolute stupidity. Are we 99%racist or just 99% thick as shit?
I always thought that our laws work in ‘the best interst of a child’, and Australia support the Declaration of the Rights of the Child:
Principle 1
The child shall enjoy all the rights set forth in this Declaration. Every child, without any exception whatsoever, shall be entitled to these rights, without distinction or discrimination on account of race, colour, sex, language, religion, antional or social origin, birth or other status, whether of himself or of his family’.
Principle 2
The child shall enjoy special protection, and shall be given opportunities and facilities, by law and by other means, to enale him develop physically, mentally, morally, spiritually and socially in a healthy and normal manner and in conditions of Freedom and dignity. In the enactment of laws for this purpose, the best interest of the child shall be the paramount consideration’ .
I must have been mistaken or somebody lost the moral compass.
Why do we hate somebody else’s children?
Ask any person who has been in a prisoner of war camp or an immigration detention centre and you will hear loud and clear that the social environment is toxic, that parents are disabled in their ability to parent, that children are deeply affected by the hope less ness around them, and that EVERY day is another day of unhappiness which destroys their childhood. No normal learning happens when people are traumatised and education in detention is a farce. Indefinite detention snuff out the flame of hope of a future. It’s been fully documented so why don’t politicians and senior public servants stop this unecessary abuse of children and all innocent asylum seekers?
Today 738 children are deprived of their liberty and that is a crime. Nearly 280 of them are teenagers sent to seek asylum alone . How would we want our sons cared for in a foreign land? Wait in detention until June 2011? What are we doing to human beings and what can possibly justify this? The legislation and regulations in place demean our reputation as a democracy with respect for human rights.
When Parliament has ” done” Afghanistan, can we have that robust discussion about asylum seekers and clarify what is law and obligation in plain non spinning English?
One more reason to renew my Greens subscription at the end of the year 🙂