It’s an interesting relationship, the bond between Australia and New Zealand. Some say it’s never really recovered from the infamous 1981 underarm cricket incident. That it’s a bit like a sibling relationship, where Australia is often accused of being the arrogant big brother.
So what happens when Australian journalists flock to the land of the long white cloud for an international breaking news event? Well, relations can get a little strained, if you take the behavior of some Aussie hacks as an example.
All the big outlets were in Greymouth, New Zealand this week to cover the Pike River coal mine disaster, which broke after a giant explosion rocked the mine last weekend. As the rescue crew waited for the all clear to be able to go into the mine and search for survivors, some sections of the media began to lose patience. Well, the Australian journos did anyway.
Here’s an initial question from a Channel Seven journalist to Pike River Coal Mine CEO Peter Whittal:
“Can you imagine New York firefighters standing around the World Trade Centre waiting to be told whether they should go in or not if there are lives in the balance?”
Unsurprisingly, Whittal refused to speculate on the hypothetical, despite the insistence of the reporter. Then there was this question from The Australian‘s Ean Higgins after receiving the latest update from Superintendent Gary Knowles, the Tasman area police commander in charge of the rescue operation:
“Superintendent Knowles, that leads to another question, there have been comments today by a variety of sources by Laurie Drew, by other members of the families, by Andrew Vickers, a mining unionist in Australia and by an Australian mining expert. If this was happening in Australia, the people that would be in charge would be the mining manager, and with the assistance of the union and technical support and was put — the people that actually know what’s going on.
“And the question was asked by all of these people, why are they not making the decisions? Why are they not calling the shots? Why is it the local country cop chief doing it? To use their words.”
Fellow journalists present at the press conference groaned, while Knowles responded to the question with a straight bat. But, in a diplomatic foray that echoed ex-PM Robert Muldoon describing the underarm stoush as “the most disgusting incident I can recall in the history of cricket”, NZ politicians rounded on Higgins. Energy minister Gerry Brownlee labelled him “boorish” and an “utter tosspot”, while Police Minister Judith Collins said it was “disgraceful” and that Higgins was “cheapening the work of other journalists”.
Minister Brownlee also took issue with another of Higgins’ stories, where he wrote that “rescuers waiting desperately to enter New Zealand’s Pike River mine are pinning their hopes on the possibility that four men may be alive”. Brownlee said the story was incorrect and that it was “distressing for the families”.
It’s not the first time Higgins has come under fire for his behaviour. In 2008 he was accused on Media Watch of entering a private wake after a funeral and eating snacks paid for by the deseased’s mother. In another story in 2004, he “infiltrated” (law media expert Richard Ackland’s words) NSW Supreme Court judge Jeff Shaw’s room at The Sydney Clinic:
“Unchallenged by nurses, this reporter knocked on the door of his room, was invited to come in, and found Mr Shaw sitting on his bed, wearing a grey narrow-check jacket.
“‘How did you get in here?’ he asked, with what developed rapidly from a look of astonishment into amusement.”
Crikey is all for free and fearful questioning of public figures. But when you’re dealing with a tragedy like this, where 29 people are trapped underground in a foreign country, perhaps it’s sometimes best to leave it to the locals.
that’s newscrap for you: dishonest, unethical, irresponsible and complete strangers to the basics of human decency.
A Murdoch hack “cheapening the work of other journalists” – I like that.
Hasn’t Judith Collins ever read our limited “Limited News” news?
Have they got a broad “news” media ownership over there?
What’s her address, we can send her a few thousand “back copies”?
Actually I think your examples on Higgins are very weak, and not pursuasive, notwithstanding his mangled grammar.
What journo doesn’t try and visit a patient who is news worthy? If they are well enough?
Eat food at a wake? Well crucify me. Get real.
What IS a police officer doing managing a mine disaster?
Was there any rescuer willing to volunteer to go in on the first few days? Perhaps that’s the real question.
Bet there was.
And you missed the biggest w*nk – Martin Ferguson sneaking out the Montara oil spill in the shadow of the NZ miners tragedy. Unforgivable sleaze by Ferguson there. And you didn’t see it.
TOM MCLOUGHLIN Posted Friday, 26 November 2010 at 4:03 pm
I agree, even if Higgins’ previous behaviour may have been suspect, each event requires separate assessment.
Looking at the hapless kiwis who were fronting the press and apparently in charge, did not imbue any sense of either confidence or urgency. These seemed typical of the breed of bureaucratic “safety first” types who know how to generate reams of rules on paper (for others to follow.) but do not know how to deal with a real crisis. The 9/11 comparison is fair enough (with the obvious response that hundreds of firemen died “unnecessarily”).
I was also wearied by the ABC news analysis programs, 7.30 Report and Lateline. I watch these shows for “analysis” not for the kind of hand-wringing weepy populist stuff we got (Tony Jones spent most of his time on the story last night interviewing a priest! This was 60 Minutes territory!); not only did we get that on all the news services including ABC and commercials but we did not get any serious issues analyzed. For example, even the apparent declaration that all was lost after the second explosion. Obviously it wasn’t good news but did it automatically have to be the end? And if it was, then I would have liked to know why. To this moment I still have not seen any attempted explanation. (My own suspicion: the mine people have known all along they were already dead and this was a way to bring it to a close.)