Yesterday’s Essential Report data on where voters source their news, and whom they trust to provide it, sheds light on what should be an uncomfortable fact for all of us in the commercial media, whether mainstream or otherwise: there is a trust gap between public broadcasting (and especially the ABC) and commercial media. And it’s substantial.
According to Essential, ABC TV’s news was regarded as always or usually trustworthy by 82% of voters. ABC Radio wasn’t far behind on 78%, and SBS TV 78% as well. About one in five voters believe these broadcasters are “always trustworthy”.
The closest commercial media gets is the free-to-air TV news bulletins — 69% of voters regard them as always or usually trustworthy, but only 5% regard them as “always trustworthy”.
While newspapers are trusted by 65% of voters, there is an alarming level of distrust towards our mastheads — 29% of voters believe newspapers can seldom, or never, be trusted.
The ABC’s dominance is further reinforced by data in a recent MEAA report on the future of journalism, which found the ABC was the most trusted online news source.
Trustworthiness is critical to a public broadcaster. Its core function must be the provision of high-quality, independent news and current affairs. Despite remorseless complaints of bias, the ABC is well ahead of commercial broadcasters, newspapers and online media in how it is regarded by voters.
The size of the gap between the ABC and SBS and the commercial media, however, must be of concern to all of us outside the public broadcasters, and particularly in our broadsheets, where an ostensible commitment to quality journalism despite constant cost pressures doesn’t appear to translate into readers’ trust. As a publicly funded media outlet, the ABC should set the standard. But it shouldn’t be that far ahead in public perceptions. Commercial media have to do more to earn the trust of their users.
They should learn that they won’t gain this trust by attacking the credibility of news sources we trust – ie the ABC. Murdoch’s take note!
Of course the main difference between the ABC and the likes of “Limited News”, when it comes to “perceptions of bias”, is that one is “ours” and the other is “Murdoch’s”, so is answerable to no one else, and thus “bias” (as PR managers, eulogising and selling the virtues of the LNP, “Limited News Party”, to voters, colouring their perception of politics, influencing their voting intentions – while sailing under this flag of conveniences of “Need to Know” ….. sorry “Right to no”) is a given! If it didn’t operate as it does, who’d recognise it at all?
P’raps commercial tv’s trustworthiness is undermined by those dreadful ‘current affairs’ shows at 6:30 pm which make unbelievable claims.
In the case of newspapers, what would you consider to be an acceptable level of ‘untrustworthiness’? And what was the ABC’s by the way?
PS Klewso, struggling to see your point…so you’re saying that News Limited papers are what exactly?
@Gavin: But the ABC has one of those dreadful current affairs shows, too. Ok, it’s marginally less dreadful, but even so…