Hacking up the truth. Hacking! NBN! An irresistible combination, apparently, for most of the mainstream media this morning after the arrest of a Cowra truck driver and “self-taught hacker” (presumably he couldn’t afford to enrol in a blackhat cracking course at his local tech) who is alleged to have been involved in cracking a number of sites, including the University of Sydney and wholesale internet provider Platform Networks.
Platform Networks was one of the first wholesale participants in trials of the NBN on the mainland and journalists from News Limited, Fairfax and particularly the ABC immediately linked the NBN to the suspect, who used the imaginative name of “Evil”. As late as 12.30pm today, the ABC was still headlining its story “Self-taught hacker charged over NBN attack”, despite the AFP making it clear the attacks were unrelated to the NBN and NBN Co issuing a statement declaring the NBN “was not affected by this incident. The company said to be involved is not yet offering services over the NBN.”
The ABC recently seems to have picked up News Ltd’s long-running campaign against the NBN. Its “Online Investigative Unit” produced a story earlier this month in which it was claimed the NBN would “widen the gap between remote indigenous communities and the broader community” because remote communities would only receive 12Mbps while metropolitan and major regional centres would have access to speeds up to, eventually, 1Gbps and beyond. — Bernard Keane
The Oz v the Greens (cont). For the record, from The Australian‘s editorial page today …
“Deputy Greens leader Christine Milne, an equal-opportunity hater who shares out her grudges between coalminers, loggers and News Limited journalists, accused The Australian of opposing action on climate change. We won’t waste space here correcting her, since we know Green MPs do not read The Australian‘s editorials, including several in recent weeks welcoming Labor’s carbon pricing scheme. It is fair to say we did not endorse everything in the package and that, curiously, most of its less redeeming features bore the fingerprints of Senator Milne and her colleagues. Nevertheless, when it comes to action on climate change we’re right on board, and Senator Milne’s groundless claim that we print endless columns by so-called climate change sceptics says more about her bias than ours.”
Chatting with the Chancellor. A glimpse at political life is provided by the list made available yesterday of the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer’s meetings with newspaper executives since the election of May 2010 …
— Read the full document at The Stump
Boland sticks with Seven. Despite it oft-rumoured that former Sunrise EP Adam Boland was attempting to get out of his contract at Seven in a bid to set up a breakfast show at Ten, yesterday came the news that Boland has dropped his legal action against Seven and taken on the position of Channel Seven’s Director of Social Media and Strategy. Boland will also develop some pilot programs for Seven.
It will be interesting to see where his role as Director of Social Media and Strategy takes him. With TV consumption already being driven by so much of the audience already, this is a role that will only grow in importance. It’s actually refreshing to see that Seven has identified the value in deploying resources to engage with and evolve within this space. — Read more from Dan Barrett at White Noise
Front page of the day. The clock is ticking on a crucial debt deal in the US …
Phone hacking Mirror turns to NotW rival
“Trinity Mirror has ordered an inquiry into whether its journalists were involved in phone hacking after a sharp fall in the company’s share price was prompted by claims from former journalists that the practice had been rife at the Mirror titles.” — The Independent
Blogger ‘has proof’ of Piers Morgan knowledge of hacking
“CNN host Piers Morgan was editor of a British tabloid, the Daily Mirror, at a time when many British tabloid reporters were committing illegal hacking of voicemails. Morgan has vociferously denied personal involvement in or knowledge of anything like that under his watch — but a prominent political blogger claims to have a recording that proves otherwise.” — Forbes
Phone hacking aside, James could get pay rise
“James Murdoch could soon earn a cash bonus of up to $12m (£7.3m) from News Corporation on top of his $3m salary even though the part of the company he has run has been mired in the phone-hacking scandal, shut one of its flagship British newspapers and been forced to abandon the bid for BSkyB in the wake of cross-party hostility in the UK.” — The Guardian
Alan Jones hits out at his ‘nasty’ critics
“2GB presenter Alan Jones has labelled his critics as ‘losers’ and ‘nasty, small minded people on the ABC’ in a strident defence of his broadcasting style. Speaking in a rare interview to mark the one year point from the beginning of the Olympics — for which 2GB is Australia’s official commercial radio broadcaster — Jones told Mumbrella editor Tim Burrowes that his listeners realise he is expressing his opinions and that he does not set out to be a journalist.” — Mumbrella
Optus examined over catch-up TV service
“The blurred lines between content makers and distributors in a digital world could be tested once again with the free-to-air networks and the AFL contemplating legal action against Optus’s new catch-up television services. It is understood industry body Free TV Australia has engaged law firm Freehills to examine whether the Optus TV Now service has breached copyright laws.” — The Australian
Has anyone worked out exactly why the ‘ABC Online Investigations Unit’ exists?
If ‘ABC Online’ is supposed to imply that the unit primarily generates reports for the ABC website, as opposed to feeding stories into TV or radio, you’d have to ask what the point is. Surely all journalism done at the ABC should feed stories in to be distributed across the ABC’s platforms as appropriate – why is there a unit dedicated to linking a source of journalism in the ABC to a particular destination?
The ‘Online Investigations Unit’ certainly doesn’t stick to reporting on ‘Online’ issues – last year one of their rogue reporters was using the Online Investigations Unit umbrella for a concerted partisan attack on the BER program; nothing ‘Online’ about that.
Is it perhaps ‘Online Investigations’ in the sense that they get most of their journalism done by punching random stuff into google searches?
One can’t help but feel the ‘ABC Online Investigations Unit’ is merely a cover for amateurish or partisan hack work that no other part of the ABC is willing to take ‘credit’ for.
ABC was Relevant (Part 44) (a John Clarke, Bryan Dawes skit)
(The Customer)
[Scene: A car yard. BRYAN is perusing the stock. He is approached by JOHN]
John: Morning! Looking for a new car?
Bryan: Nope. Prime Minister, actually.
John: You’re the third one this morning. Anything in mind?
Bryan: You know……. nothing fancy, reliable, economical family model. Something to get the country from A to B.
John: You mean like a Howard?
Bryan: Yeah….a little Johnny. Nothing flash, does the job. Low maintenance, economical, sensible. Runs for years, no troubles.
John: So…. you used to have one?
Bryan: Yeah. About 10 years. Great little model – don’t know why I got rid of him –biggest mistake I’ve ever made…
John: What happened?
Bryan: Traded him in for a Kevin 07.
John: Big mistake…
Bryan: Lot of people bought it. Good political mileage.
John: How was the Kevin 07?
Bryan: Came with a $900 factory rebate – that was good.
John: Anything else?
Bryan: Not much. Sounded nice but nothing under the bonnet. It was a lemon.
John: Didn’t stick around for long did it?
Bryan: Nah – had a factory recall. Shipped overseas and was never seen again.
John: What was the problem?
Bryan: Lots. But the final straw was the navigation system. Plug it in and it automatically loses its own way.
John: Whatcha got now?
Bryan: It’s a Gillard-Brown.
John: The hybrid?
Bryan: Yeah. The Eco-drive system – not a good idea. An engine that can’t deliver hooked up to a transmission stuck in permanent reverse…
John: Green paintwork with a red interior. And steering that always lurches to the left for no apparent reason – that’s the one?
Bryan: The Fustercluck model.
John: The only one they made, Bryan. Not the vehicle of choice for the road to recovery – but did they finish up fixing the navigation system?
Bryan: Made it worse. Turn it on and it does a press release, heads off in all directions and goes nowhere.
John: So that’s why you’re here?
Bryan: That’s right. I’m stuck with a government that’s wasteful, expensive, ineffective and past its use by date. I don’t suppose you’ve heard of the “Cash for Clunkers” scheme?
John: Join the queue brother.
“The Whizzers of Oz” can point all they like to their words of “editorial sentiment” (“Right on bored”) – but look at their actions, the space and dedication of publicity in their paper.
They can choose to go with “the science” or they can go with “party dogma”. Look how often they’re playing the “Hyper Bowl”.