The annual deluge of political donations data has been public since Wednesday morning and in media terms it proved to be a one-day wonder.
The $14 million spent by the tobacco industry fighting plain packaging legislation was the biggest single number that stood out, but the pokies industry could yet trump that number when the 2011-12 figures are finally released on February 1 next year. Pokies industry donations for 2010-11 got a brief mention in yesterday’s coverage and they certainly make for interesting reading when totalled up. Try this for size:
Labor pokies money
ACT ALP
Canberra Labor Club: $613,511
Federal ALP
AHA: 101,600
Clubs NSW: $27,500
Australian Casinos Association: $2266
NSW ALP
Sutherland District Trade Union Club (“Tradies”): $100,000
Clubs NSW: $79,850
AHA: $79,850
Victorian ALP
AHA: $150,000
Crown Casino: $25,000
WA ALP
Burswood Casino: $22,000
Total for ALP: $1.2 million
Liberal and National Party pokies donations
Federal Liberals
AHA: $105,000
Woolworths: $16,500
Clubs NSW: $15,000
NSW Liberals
AHA: $330,000
Clubs NSW: $207,000
The Warringah Club: $50,000
Star City Casino: $40,000
Harbour Beach Hotel: $11,000
NSW Nationals
AHA: $125,705
Clubs NSW: 50,000
Star City Casino: $64,300
Victorian Liberals
AHA: $70,000
Victorian Nationals
AHA: $50,000
WA Liberals
Burswood: $25,000
SA Liberals
AHA: $20,000
Total for Liberal and National parties: $1.18 million
How amazing that the industry managed to give almost exactly the same figure to the two major parties, both of which appear to be committed to Australians remaining the world’s biggest gamblers.
As the largest hotel group in the country, it is clear that Woolworths has been the biggest single contributor through the Australian Hotels Association (AHA). This will make the position of federal Liberal gambling spokesman Kevin Andrew quite interesting when Manningham City Council moves to introduce a “double rates” regime on four Woolies pokies venues and one non-Woolies venue in 2012-13.
Kevin and I have had quite a spat in the local Murdoch paper over the past fortnight, which began when the following letter was published in The Manningham Leader on January 25:
Is anyone else appalled that Manningham’s federal representative, Kevin Andrews, is continuing to perform his role as Tony Abbott’s attack dog opposing proposed reforms to reduce the estimated $5 billion a year lost on the pokies by problem gamblers?
Manningham councillors from across the political divide voted 8-1 in favour of comprehensive Federal action last year and polls have consistently showed that a strong majority of voters support pokies betting limits and/or mandatory pre-commitment to end Australia’s embarrassing status as the world’s biggest gamblers in per capita terms.
Perhaps Mr Andrews should conduct a straw poll of the hundreds of residents who will gather on Australia Day at the council offices to see who has received his annual “Menzies Awards” for community services.
It is shameful and enormously socially damaging that more than $60 million is lost on the pokies in Manningham each year — a figure comparable to the total amount of rates received by council.
As a prominent political conservative and devoted Catholic, why is Mr Andrews opposing reform when church groups from across the board are demanding action?
Indeed, Catholic Social Services was named as a founding member of the new “Stop The Loss” coalition launched by Andrew Wilkie, Tim Costello and Nick Xenophon in Sydney last Friday.
The following feisty response from Kevin Andrews was published in the Manningham Leader two days ago:
It comes as no surprise that Stephen Mayne (“Losses too great”, Opinion, January 25) would attempt to misrepresent those he disagrees with.
The Coalition is committed to helping problem gamblers. We believe that any proposal that is to effectively deal with problem gambling has to go beyond just any one measure.
This is why the Coalition is undertaking a robust policy development process that is canvassing industry and community views to find a sensible approach to gambling reform.
We want to help problem gamblers overcome their problem.
We believe that this can only be achieved by a range of measures, including improved counselling and education measures that afford long-term relief from problem gambling.
All Stephen Mayne and Julia Gillard would do is to prolong the problem to fuel their politically opportunistic agenda.
That Stephen Mayne would suggest I turn a ceremony honouring volunteers in our community into a political event just shows how out of touch he really is.
But then again, we have come to expect this grandstanding from Stephen Mayne.
Kevin Andrews MP, Doncaster
Hmmm, after three years of cordial relations with our local federal MP, it seems this pokies issue is going to really liven up proceedings leading into council elections at the end of October.
*Stephen Mayne is a City of Manningham councillor and was not paid for this contribution
Kevin Andrews
It would be difficult for me to agree with anything that man thinks is right.
he is not on the side of the angels, and is particularly disliked by the 80% + of Australians who have expressed their urgent approval for a bill to legalise Assisted Suicide in this country.
kevin along with another supposedly DO GOODER were resonsible for scuttling the NT Euthanaisa Bill which had become LAW in the 1990’s
He is a man of no import …
JC Herself
I think the donation under NSW Libs should read Harbord Beach Hotel, not Harbour. This is the establishment of former AHA president John Thorpe who once said: “Look, democracy’s not cheap. Democracy’s not cheap”
I thought “community views” were pretty well established – as were those of the industry “making a living off people losing money/gambling”?
But one makes bigger “donations”?
(What’s this “Word Press Error/You are posting comments too quickly. Slow down.”?)
Has Andrews outlined the coalition’s “robust policy development process” or “range of measures” ? Don’t want to discredit a very long sitting member, if you will, but surely by now “robust policy development process” is a sad and useless spin phrase for “we’re not doing much but the proposal is bad, ok.”