Last year, Australia installed more residential rooftop solar systems than any other country in the world. Data released by the REC Agents Association shows there are now 1.5 million solar PV and solar hot water systems installed in Australia. Nearly 18% of households have a solar system installed.
Thinking back to my time at the Australian government’s Greenhouse Office and the Business Council for Sustainable Energy, from 2002 to 2007, I would have never expected such a feat to be achieved. And it can probably be largely attributed to Malcolm Turnbull.
During this time, installations of solar PV were like a tiny pimple on a huge back of coal-fired power. Annual installation rates were measured in kilowatts not hundreds of megawatts. The industry was pretty much dominated by a single player in BP Solar, with everyone else playing around the edges.
The businesses engaged in installation were enthusiasts who did it partly out of love for the technology, rather than large professional organisations focussed on profit and driving down costs. It was a cosy cottage industry pure and simple. Both the power industry and the government bureaucracy largely thought that it would never amount to anything substantial, either in terms of the electricity market or greenhouse gas abatement.
Then something changed. The precise date was May 8, 2007 when the Howard government handed down its final budget. I remember being at the national conference for the Business Council for Sustainable Energy (now the Clean Energy Council), standing around a television with a group of the major players in the Australian solar PV industry. When Peter Costello announced the rebate for solar PV would be doubled from $4000 to $8000 per kilowatt, I don’t think there was a single person in the room who wasn’t shocked.
But we probably shouldn’t have been so surprised. Turnbull was the environment minister at the time and has never done anything by halves. He’s a man who already had fame and fortune and was now in a desperate hurry to leave a positive imprint on the Australian policy landscape.
All in the solar sector knew the doubling of the rebate would lead to a boom in sales, but it didn’t lead to a boom in profits. Instead it became a catalyst for a swarm of new entrants that shook-up a cosy cottage industry. These businesses were determined to convert solar into a mass-market product with large volumes but low margins. These new entrants strove to squeeze out costs to get the price of systems to a price point that would open-up an untapped, large group of customers that weren’t wealthy and weren’t off the grid.
Australia used to pay significantly more than other countries for residential solar PV systems, but now our systems are noticeably cheaper than the US and Japan, and not too far off Germany. We are now a world leader in small-scale residential systems.
But this rebate, and the multiplier for renewable energy certificates that replaced it, were heavily biased towards small residential systems of less than 2 kilowatts. This has warped the industry into one almost entirely focussed on the residential sector, when in fact the best place for solar is on commercial business rooftops. It’s a bit like some incredibly distorted body builder that has huge biceps but chicken-legs.
For the industry to be truly useful in the battle to contain Australia’s emissions, it will need to beef-up its under-sized muscles.
*This story was first published at Climate Spectator
Owen Gary, you beat me to it. If only Malcolm T would publicly embrace the NBN as he did solar panels.
Emma Alberici did a fine interview: always extremely well-researched, she is, without doubt, better than any journo ABC’s 7.30 can offer up.
I’m uncomfortable with these immoderate attacks on politicians. The NBN is great infrastructure, and it is crucial for Australia to have a high speed main trunk (rail or ‘interwebs’). There are important other models that need consideration as part of the mix. There is an excellent model using electricity lines allowing electrical supply companies to diversify into ISP’s. There is ample evidence that pervasive wi-fi produces changes in behaviour. None of these will function effectively without a high speed core. Cable to everything that stands still long enough is not an efficient approach either.
My own house has cat6 wiring to every room except wet areas. My servers and my main work computer are direct connected. The machine I’m using – connected by wi-fi. Phones, tablets, laptops are all more efficiently connected with wi-fi.
Direct connection is the best solution for many situations – but not all. One can disagree with a person – perhaps a different mix to the one he suggests – but to suggest a person, that seems pretty reasonable for a politician, is corrupt for stating this simple truth seems a bit over the top. How corrupt is he? I see no evidence he is. Let’s keep it sensible.
PS: In the interests of balance I should note that I’ve recently made similar comments to an acquaintance posting comments about the ‘red headed Devil’. I fear we are catching the American disease of polarisation.
” Data released by the REC Agents Association shows there are now 1.5 million solar PV and solar hot water systems installed in Australia. Nearly 18% of households have a solar system installed.”
This is pretty bad research. I’ll give you the 1.5 million solar hot water systems/Solar PV installed in Australia since 2001 (based on the Renewable energy certificates). However to then say that 18% of households have a solar system installed is a step too far.
I had a look at the original research and RECAA have basically added the percentage of households that have installed a solar PV system to the percentage of households that have installed a solar hot water system to get to 18%. However, they make no allowance in regards to households that might have both. So there is double counting going on.
Based on the raw RET data, there is a very strong correlation co-efficient between installations of PV and solar hot water in each postcode (0.81). This would indicate that a lot of households would have both systems installed.
And this is shown in some more ABS research “Energy Use and Conservation, March 2011” which states that 7% of households use solar hot water, 3.5% of households use Solar PV and 1.5% use both (so a total of 12% have solar systems installed)
I can understand RECAA trying to beat up the numbers a bit, but for Climate Spectator not to crunch the numbers before reporting is a bit ordinary in my opinion.
Zut,
Yes Emma Alberici did a good job on Turncoat last night, & showed how farcical his version of NBN is, perhaps Kerry O’brien has been giving some good mentoring.
Yes, yes, but what does SUZANNE BLAKE think?