In a move that has raised as many questions about its wider intent, China has announced it will send between 500 and 600 troops to Mali under a post-French UN peacekeeping mission. While the move is being welcomed in Mali as an international contribution to helping control Islamist fighters holed up in the exposed mountains in the north of the country, some external observers are viewing the contribution with a more jaundiced eye.
Mali is due to hold elections in late July, following a coup against its elected government last year.
Despite opposing the use of peacekeepers as international interference when it joined the UN in 1971, since the early 1990s China has deployed troops to 13 internationally sanctioned theatres, including to East Timor and a non-combat mission to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It currently has more than 2000 troops deployed in UN peacekeeping operations.
China does not have any direct economic or diplomatic interests in Mali. But it has been increasingly making its presence felt in Africa as it continues to search for more resources to help fuel its growing economy. China currently has investments across Africa estimated at more than US$100 billion.
China’s main involvement in Africa is in Sudan, Algeria, Zambia and South Africa, with lesser investments in Kenya, Tanzania and Nigeria and eight other countries. China’s trade with Africa began to take off around 2003, jumping ahead around 2007, corresponding to the establishment of the private equity China-Africa Development Fund. According to the China Development Bank:
“CADFund works differently from economic aid to Africa in that it is not allocated by nation but independently operated and based on market economy principles, the Fund invests in projects and requires investment benefits.”
Last Saturday, the chairman of China’s Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, Zhang Dejiang, said China was willing to work with African countries to “advance the China-Africa new-type strategic partnership to a higher level”. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visited Africa in March to promote the “strategic partnership”.
China’s troops in Mali are not expected to be on the front line fighting the Islamist insurgents who, until France’s intervention in January this year, had seized the north of the country and threatened to overthrow Mali’s government. However, the move is being seen as a further illustration of China’s increasingly proactive, indeed assertive, international policy.
As with its “assistance” elsewhere, after the troops’ deployment, China is expected to ask for a reciprocal favour. Mali is the world’s third largest producer of gold, and one of the poorest countries, with a per capita income of $1.25 a day.
*Professor Damien Kingsbury is director of the Centre for Citizenship, Development and Human Rights at Deakin University
The question posed in the headline is not answered in the article. I had trouble understanding what the actual point of the article was, other than to feed exonophobic fears about Chinese activities.
Surely a far more relevant question to be posed and discussed is why is the US rapidly expanding its military bases in Africa? These add to the 1000 plus already in existence. History overwhelmingly shows that no good follows the expansion of American imperialism.
Where’s the “jaundiced eye” toward Anglo-American/European interests in Africa, which has extracted profits from the poorest people in the world for centuries. Or “Australian” mining investments partly financed by AusAID? At least China pays for what it gets from Africa.
That would be third in Africa for gold production – and apx 15th in world.
Mali 42,000t – Ghana 86,000t – South Africa – 197,698
and for global context
1st – China 320,000t
2nd – US 223,000t
3rd – OZ 222,000t