Tony does the easy bit. It’s stopping the boats that is important, not using clever words on an Indonesian visit. The Prime Minister’s great diplomatic escape from Jakarta is a long way from being the political triumph some are portraying it as.
The dangerous part of living up to his pre-election policies is yet to come. The Tony Abbott promise to turn back the boats has the potential to become every bit as damaging to him as his predecessor’s “there will be no carbon tax under a government I lead”.
The problem with cattle and Indonesia. The memories of politicians can be short. Those currently pandering to the wishes of live cattle exporters forget the reason for Labor’s ban on shipments to Indonesia. It was just a little matter of cruelty to animals that sickened most Australians when television exposed them to it. The backlash against the trade was considerable and the Labor government acted as it did in response to that broad public pressure. Animal welfare remains a potent political problem and being seen as pandering to Indonesia by ignoring it just increases the political risks.
Then there’s the Barnaby problem. Abbott might have given his support to Indonesian ownership of Northern Territory land but his Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce seems to have different views.
Paul Howes is a dangerous man. Follow the advice of AWU Secretary Paul Howes on removing conscience votes on same-sex marriage and the Labor Party risks another split. I think Howes is as dangerous a motor mouth as Labor has ever had.
Been there, seen that. US government services halted and US share prices go up. The stock market has seen political idiocy from Republicans before. It might be a few years since the last one but there have been plenty of congressional standoffs before, as this graphic shows:
Eventually the American politicians stopped playing games and governing returned and there is no reason that I know of to think that the lunacy of the Republican Tea Party crowd of today will have any more influence on sensible Republican Congressmen than Newt Gingrich did last time.
News and views noted along the way.
- The Simpsons to kill off character this season
- Germany’s next big transformation — Why Angela Merkel will ultimately opt for a Black-Green coalition.
- The reason Republicans were willing to shut it down — “Don’t write the Republicans off as totally crazy. They know that if Obamacare works, it will wreck chances for attaining their real goal — lowering taxes on the rich, wiping out regulations and widening even more the gap between the very rich and everyone else.”
- Francis says the court is the ‘leprosy of the papacy’ — “In his wide-ranging interview … came an admission that in the past, heads of the church ‘have often been narcissists, flattered and thrilled by their courtiers. ‘The court is the leprosy of the papacy,’ he said.”
Why is it that when I click on “The Simpsons to kill off character this season” I get taken to a link to create a gmail account?
jmendelssohn
My apologies
The gremlin got me. The link is now corrected
Some are saying Tony Abbott does not mind cruelty to animals. As long as there is a dollar to be made, the live animal trade to Indonesia will continue. Likewise Barnaby Joyce must be disappointed that Australian rural properties are being sold to overseas investors. Last I heard Barnaby had lost his voice.
Most people seem to have missed a much more prosaic reason for Republicans to oppose health care for the unemployed. At present, the threat of losing health care if they lose their jobs makes workers willing to accept work wages and conditions, and generally put up with crap, that they would not do if they could leave their jobs to look for another one without losing health insurance. If Obamacare works, it will remove a very big stick in the hand of employers.
I agree with your comment re. Howes. It would be a gift to the Government, allowing Abbott to escape censure for not allowing a conscience vote on his side. It would also push social conservatives out of the party.
A different, but related, issue is re. a future vote to override the ACT same sex marriage legislation. Should there be a conscience vote on this or should it be caucused on the basis of territory rights?