From the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fifth report, 2013, produced by more than 800 scientists:
“Human influence on the climate system is clear.
It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
It is virtually certain that there will be more frequent hot and fewer cold temperature extremes over most land areas … as global mean temperatures increase. It is very likely that heat waves will occur with a higher frequency and duration.”
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, October 23, 2013:
“These fires are certainly not a function of climate change — they’re just a function of life in Australia.”
There has been an unedifying squabble between Abbott and his allies on the one side and climate functionaries and environmentalists on the other on whether the extensive NSW bushfires are a sign of climate change.
In our view, there comes a time when there has been enough arguing, and a rational assessment of the available evidence demands strong and effective legislative action from our government. Climate change is one such policy area.
There is a strong body of evidence that anthropogenic climate change is occurring and that, among other things, it will cause more frequent and extensive bushfires in Australia. It is clear that reducing greenhouse gas emissions would result in less severe consequences for the climate.
Today, Bernard Keane is calling it in Crikey. Australia must address climate change. We must substantially reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. If we squib this task, we are simply handing a heavier burden (and much greater costs) to future generations.
Abbott wishes to remove the carbon price and instead hand out cash grants to hand-picked companies that promise to reduce (or absorb) emissions. Australia’s carbon price is flawed, but it is a far superior policy instrument to reduce emissions.
Whether the NSW bushfires were caused, or exacerbated by, climate change is difficult to answer definitely. The point is, if we do not address climate change, we will see more of these types of fires. As NSW smoulders, that should be enough to prompt a serious reconsideration of Abbott’s climate policy.
Crikey Calling is independent media for independent minds – in handy podcast form! Join the Crikey crew for a lively (if somewhat wonky) look behind the scenes of politics and power in Australia.
The Abbott government has only been in power for seven weeks, but the shine is already gone. Join Canberra correspondent Bernard Keane and deputy editor Cathy Alexander for a look at what’s gone wrong, and what has happened to transparency. Stream it or download here.
The thing about accepting the possibility/probability of Climate Change, as evidenced by the collective minds of 800 Scientists . . one must start with an open mind!!
The PM and Shock jock(s) all baulked at the Starting Gate.
But our foremost climate scientists, Blot & AJones, have told us repeatedly that it is a hoax and that hte world hasn’t warmed since …insert random date.
And even if it were real, it’ll be good not bad according to another noted expert, Matt Ridley in the Spectator.
I know whom I believe.
Today has been the epitome of ineptitude and moronic comment.
The way the PM insulted the UM chair for a start and then Dr Hunt besmirching all Australian Doctoral graduates by citing Wikipedia as his authority on Bush Fires on the BBC has with Abbott made us an embarrassing laughing stock that not even the shock jocks cannot emulate — O’Reilly meet Australia’s Wacko’s – morons and cretins. We elected this mob – well Rupert did and they join the Tea Party and Fox News wacko’s making Australia the bogan capital of the world.
I usually fail undergraduates who cite Wikipedia instead of reputable scholarly sources. What kind of clown is Hunt?
Abbott’s?