“A national election involves the casting of over 13 million voters for each house, which are handled by short-term employees following procedures carefully prescribed by legislation. Easy as it may be for the armchair critic to insist that this vast logistical exercise be conducted without any hitches, a certain rate of error is inevitable.”
So says our Poll Bludger, who reckons any notion of incompetence by the Australian Electoral Commission — for, err, misplacing 1375 Senate ballot papers in Western Australia — is undeserved.
Perhaps that’s too kind; there’s no doubt this one was buggered up — badly — and the AEC needs to examine whether its systems across the country are up the scratch. Electronic voting is probably “inevitable”, an apologetic AEC commissioner Ed Killesteyn said on Radio National this morning, but the cost and logistics of that push it out to the long-term.
And before then, as William Bowe argues, “rather than respond to the present fiasco by launching an inquisition against the AEC, which in most respects serves as an example for the rest of the world to follow, the focus should be on giving it a simpler and more logical job to do”. That is, the mess of preference rigging — highlighted in stark fashion by a slew of minor parties this election — that so complicates counting and puts undeserving candidates into Parliament.
There’s only one thing that will make voters more angry than having to vote again — getting an MP nobody wanted.
Judging by the comments from WA voters aired on the ABC at lunch time today, who wins doesn’t seem to matter. They just don’t want to vote again (at least, that was the majority verdict).
Cost and inconvenience seemed to be the main objections. Most said they had already voted, and didn’t see why the powers that be couldn’t just pick a winner!!
Interestingly, the main detractor from this view was an immigrant from Iran. Perhaps those of us who were born here, don’t value our democratic right to vote as much as we should?
I agree that the AEC has received far too much criticism for a minor error. And no way would I agree with ‘electronic’ voting. The evidence from the USA would suggest that it is far too easy to interfere with the outcome from that kind of system. I say, maintain the paper trail – at least there can be a recount!
BTW , Just how does Clive Palmer get awat with slandering the AEC
Sure it stuffed up ( who amongst us hasn’t) but that’s a lot different from calling it fraud which Palmer has been only too ready too.
Please no electronic voting. We’ll get Diebold tendering for it, results won’t be auditable by anyone without a PhD in Computer Science, and we’ll never be able to trust an election outcome again.
As per CML & JamesH – NO electronic voting as it would unaccountable. At least most? of the ballot papers were able to be counted & recounted – no chance with integers in the ether.
Also let us not lose the perfect baby (PR & STV)with the bathwater of rorted preference dealings. I even worry about the malign effects of optional preferential voting – as demonstrated in NSW.
Heaven forfend that the lazy/ignorant support the Right’s wet dream of FptP & non compulsory voting as currently being spruiked by the usual suspects -Nick Minchin & Jones among others. Jones this morning even referred, disparingly to “..this one-man-one-vote stuff..” when bemoaning the lack of Reps. fodder (“..only 2 MPs!..” cried He, ignoring the small number of sentients in rural Qld). The Great Man then went to point out that, without preferences & compulsory voting, the Greens would never trouble the scorer and the landscape could be denuded of those killer trees (nods to Ronnie Raygun).
“buggered up — badly” – give me a break. Compare the outcome to USA!
1375 missing papers out of 26million? Get some perspective pls.