Who’s this in The Age op-ed pages? Oh hai, Virginia Haussegger, journalist and campaigner, newly gonged in the Queen’s Birthday Honours List. The move was a sly one by the Abbott government. They don’t like women much, and they like bloody feminists even less, but they know they’ve got to have one or two in the lists.
Haussegger fits the bill perfectly — ostensibly for her UN campaigning on issues such as rape in war, but largely for a single article she wrote in 2002, entitled (for once the sub was not taking the piss) “The sins of our feminist mothers”. Published at a time when The Age‘s op-ed pages were a lively arena of debate — not yards of boring in-house prose — Haussegger’s piece argued that:
“For those of us who listened to our feminist foremothers’ encouragement; waved the purple scarves at their rallies … we’re now left — many of us at least — as premature ’empty-nesters’ … While encouraging women in the ’70s and ’80s to reach for the sky, none of our purple-clad, feminist mothers thought to tell us the truth about the biological clock … I am childless and I am angry. Angry that I was so foolish to take the word of my feminist mothers as gospel.”
For those in childcare at the time — put there by evil feminist mothers, purple ones — the article caused a storm that raged for months. It contained two truths and a falsehood. The truths were that the professional world was structured for a male lifespan, not a female one, and that a certain Thatcherite-New Right individualism had taken bits of feminism to sell a “you can have it all” ethos. The falsehood? Haussegger and others then retrojected this on to the leaders of the second wave feminist revolution of the ’70s, such as Anne Summers, Germaine Greer and others — all of whom had been politically radical, anti-corporate, and advocating the very opposite of a possessive have-it-all individualism.
But the falsehood was more interesting than the truths, because it created a simple myth of blame and deceit — and one that gave a certain political imprimatur to female generational conflict of the “my mother, my self, my God” type. Haussegger somewhat faded from view after that stoush. But someone didn’t forget, and thus she has been honoured this week, no doubt for good works, but also as the sort of feminist whom anti-feminists can like. It’s a funny old world, but not if you have to clean it.
Don’t worry Guy, God is in his heaven. For balance,Hetty Johnson, she of vilify Bill Henson fame, got gonged too.
Both seem appropriate for the vision of the current Minister for Women.
Perhaps you thought it as a nice quip to close with, Guy, but it is actually a very snide, insidious put-down of women to suggest they are forced to do all cleaning. Gender stereotyping of the worst kind.
Its mystifying why any “progressives” have accepted gongs from this awful gumint.
Oh, and stuff Lizzie’s birthday…. “Queens Birthday Honours List” – what an anachronism. How about a “Mabo Day Honours List”?
Hey Guy,
So Haussegger once wrote a column that wailed about having waited too late to have children. Yeah, I was annoyed that she blamed it on me. Yeah, I doubt that the ‘feminist mothers’ were the main promoters of having it all and taking however long it took to do it. Emotional pain is not necessarily soothed by theory; face it, writers write when confronted by pain – think of all those love gone wrong poems and songs. She’s been writing about a lot more since then. So, I hardly think she was awarded an honour for that 2002 cry from the heart. Feminists don’t sing in unison any more than any other diverse group of people interested in a cause do.