Attorney-General George Brandis’ views on free speech when applied to News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt, March 24, 2014:
“People do have a right to be bigots, you know … People like Mr Bolt should be free to express any opinion on a social or a cultural or a political question that they wish to express.”
Brandis’ views on free speech when applied to Fairfax media’s editorial cartoonist Glen Le Lievre, August 4, 2014:
“I thought the cartoon was deplorable. I think that critics of Israel’s foreign policy of course have every right to express their views. But I would have thought that a responsible media organisation would have a very good look at itself when it publishes cartoons [of] the kind we haven’t seen since Germany in the 1930s.”
According to Brandis’ very own bigot-o-meter, offensive claims about Aboriginal people gaming the system are OK for publication, but racial stereotypes about Jewish people are not. Both groups have experienced racism, vilification and attempted genocide, so Crikey wonders: why the distinction?
Of course, critics of Fairfax’s decision last month to publish Le Lievre’s cartoon (which Sydney Morning Herald editor-in-chief Darren Goodsir has now retracted and apologised for, while The Australian has republished it) can still take their concerns up in court under section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act … but they’d better get in quick.
In both cases Brandis appears to be of the view that people, including critics .. “have every right to express their views”. The difference is Bolt was prosecuted for voicing his view. That is what I believe Brandis takes issue with.
Of course there is a distinction.. It is a well known fact that regardless of what monstrous acts the Israeli government indulges in it is free from any criticism. Why, only the other day Christopher Pyne was in Jerusalem telling Netanyahu that he and his government were on the right side of history, and that Australia would stick with them. If Pyne says its is OK to kill women and children then of course it must be.
The First Law Officer’s quote concluding ” . . . publishes cartoons (of) the kind we haven’t seen since Germany in the 1930’s.”
Is that not the point Attorney-GENERAL?? We ARE seeing such cartoons because Nations, and in particular the Australian Government is, re-creating similar concerns within the body politic, of that 1930 decade. Totalitarian Governments always begin with distortion of truth, repressive secrecy, propaganda ie use of mass media, unaccountability before the law, stigmatization/alienation of minorities and incarceration?
On Abbott’s Animal Farm, “All bigots are equal, but some bigots are more equal than others.”
Apparently the cartoon in question was largely based on a photograph of some Israeli citizens gathered on a hilltop overlooking Gaza. They were waving Israeli flags and cheering as the bombs/missiles fell on that doomed region.
Art (cartoon) imitating life (photograph) perhaps?