The European Space Agency’s Philae lander weighed less than a sheet of A4 paper in the micro-gravity of Comet 67/P Churyumov-Gerasimenko when it drifted on to the comet’s surface this morning.
The control centre at Darmstadt in Germany had a collective seizure when the 10-year journey briefly went radio silent at the end of its seven hour descent phase from the Rosetta mother ship.
Then the signal came back, after what might have been a gentle bounce according to early analysis of the interrupted telemetry, and grown men and women wept and cheered as history was made.
Philae — think of a large box weighing 100 kgs on Earth dropping slower than a feather — fell 20 kilometres to the underside of one of the slowly rotating ends of what is a roughly dumbbell shaped comet nucleus that would fit, rather untidily, inside the Melbourne CBD.
What it met was so soft yet spongy that the harpoons that were supposed to help tether it to the surface didn’t fire, and Philae came to rest so lightly on the surface that screwing it down into position without sending it spinning off into space is one of the urgent priorities in the next day or so.
The above photo from Philae is the last released by ESA during the descent phase when it was 3000 metres above the underside of one end of the comet. One end of the comet can be seen in the background, mostly eclipsed by the nearer end.
The first panoramic images from Philae are expected later today, after breakfast local time, when we can expect a full-blown press conference.
Critical issues that remain to be clarified — apart from keeping Philae on the comet while it harpoons, screws and then digs into its microgravity surface — include the state of its solar panels.
They have to be correctly oriented to recharge the 64 hours or so of battery power it began using as soon as it was ejected from Rosetta .
In case this doesn’t happen, Philae is programmed to conduct two and a half Earth days of crammed studies of the materials on (and just under) the comet’s surface, instead of the potential six weeks of observations under solar power.
The science reporting of the landing has so far included some cringe-worthy references to the incredible speed of the comet. The comet is doing 18 kms a second in its orbit, but Earth averages 30 kms a second, so the fixation on speed, while relevant to the delicately calculated long voyage to Churyumov-Gerasimenko, has no relevance to the slow-motion events of today.
Similarly, references to the mission discovering the origins of (variously) human life, the water source for the world’s oceans, and the origins of the solar system, are embarrassingly gauche, and have been recited for almost every space mission ever sent to the moon, to Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Titan, and the currently-in-progress journeys by NASA probes to Ceres and Pluto.
Rosetta and its Philae lander seek knowledge, which is what science does, rather than confirmation of informed guesses. If space has taught us one thing, it is that out there, everything we thought we once knew is wrong.
While Ben makes some good points about both the mission and the media’s reporting of it, I wish he’d drop the snark. The tone in yesterday and today’s article is that of a first year Pol Sci student who, having happened to have read a bit ahead in the textbook, believes it justifies sneering haughtily at his poor, ill-informed and ’embarrassingly gauche’ classmates.
Meanwhile he adds precious little scientific substance himself over this editorialising. I’ve subscribed to Crikey for a number of years now and haven’t seen Ben comment on problems in Australia’s STEM curriculum or the public’s science [il]literacy. So it seems a bit unfair for him to take issue with it now.
Whether or not they are directly involved in an individual mission, scientists and their many avid lay-followers use occasions like this to engage with the public (the ones who ultimately pay for these missions!) and to build support for new research and projects. 18kms is a speed no-one on Earth experiences (outside their own frame of motion) but it uplifts the spirit to know we as a species can achieve such wondrous technical feats. References to the ‘origin of life’ might not be absolutely relevant to this mission but they go to the heart of the modern justification for exploration (hint: it’s no longer about finding lands of gold, slaves and new empires).
Please Ben, we need more scientists, engineers and dreamers who are also dab-hands at orbital mechanics. But we won’t get them by belittling the scientists and communicators who seek to inspire the next generation. Instead, point people at the wealth of available information* out there so next time they can be the kid who has read just a little bit further than you.
* For example, off the top of my head: Veritaserum (YouTube); MinutePhysics (YouTube); What-if (XKCD); Vsauce (YouTube); Bad Astronomy Blog
Actually Ben, as all comets appeared very early in the solar system’s history, understanding their composition will provide invaluable insights into the formation of the planets including earth.
The GCMS analysis of the comet’s ice will hopefully provide a fingerprint of what complex organic compounds existed in the solar system prior to Earth’s formation. Understanding what building blocks were available may give us a much clearer picture of how life gained a foothold on our planet.
As comets have been spotted in 11 other solar systems, the results from Philae may give us a clue to just how likely life may be on other exoplanets.
Personally I think these are pretty major goals for any scientific mission and hardly gauche.
Tim,
I appreciate your comments. But I didn’t make them in a vacuum, but as I have in the past in a range of publications, largely at the behest of friends in astronomy and other fields who feel pressured to make such glib oversimplified statements by administrators who see the corporate PR approach to truth an important lever to use to raise profile and thus funding chances. I do have the confidence of some very good scientists, dig around, and you’ll come across them.
Damn! The comet just would have to have a Russian-Ukrainian name, wouldn’t it! Oh well, it shows I suppose that if those nations can cooperate jointly in outer space, then so should they be able to on Earth.
I think that the origin of life stuff may be a redux of Fred Hoyle’s ‘cosmic seeds’ speculation in the 60s.