data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/332be/332beea64bbbb60d064eb2f71c3590e0d7d1d23f" alt=""
Now there are four polls showing the Coalition and Labor neck and neck — two from Newspoll, a fortnight apart, and two from Essential, a week apart. And both now show that the Prime Minister’s standing with voters is eroding — his net approval rating in Essential has fallen sharply and is down to just three in Newspoll (44% of those polls approve of his performance, versus 41% who disapprove).
Part of this is inevitable — no prime minister can sustain huge approval numbers for any length of time. Kevin Rudd’s initial popularity began wearing off in 2008 but then was turbocharged by his successful handling of the financial crisis, which sent his numbers to rockstar levels, so he was a special case. But Turnbull’s falling numbers have coincided with an evaporation of the government’s once strong polling lead over Labor. The Coalition might still be confident it could defeat Labor, but it’s no longer the sure thing it was a few weeks ago. Not given the recent displays from the ministry, which suggest a long election campaign might turn into a series of stumbles. And not given Tony Abbott’s Rudd-like bomb-throwing from the backbench.
There is some good news for the government, however. Today’s Essential poll also shows that voters — initially vaguely supportive but undecided about Labor’s negative gearing proposals, are starting to come down against it. Renters, the voters who will actually benefit from the policy — which slightly reverses the heavy bias of the current tax system in favour of home owners and investors — are much more supportive of it. But home owners and particularly investors are much more likely to be opposed, and far more receptive to a scare campaign that claims the value of their assets will be affected. This may be the first sign that, even though the Turnbull-Morrison scare campaign on negative gearing has been almost comically inept at times, it might seriously damage Labor, which has gambled on a bold policy in an area close to the socio-economic heart of Australians, home ownership.
It’s also likely Turnbull will benefit from an improving economy. The strong GDP numbers from the December quarter suggest a lot of the economic gloom of recent months is misplaced, and if they feed into stronger wage growth and/or stronger jobs growth, much of the malaise that has beset the economy since early 2014 may well retreat — a good sign for a government going to the polls.
But Turnbull has his own problem of a perception of paralysis and drift — particularly but not limited to tax reform. Ostensibly, launching a tax reform statement in the lead-up to the budget (or what may well be a combined budget-election announcement) will allow him to deal with the perception of drift. But the risk is that his tax reform announcement will leave voters with a “so what” feeling because it is so small — a few cents off current tax rates, or a small rise in tax thresholds, paid for with some tinkering here and there. And while Labor has led with its chin on negative gearing, it is also gambling that the electorate has a real expectation of reform, an expectation stoked by the Coalition itself, which hyped the “budget emergency” and the need for tough decisions. A “reform package” that is basically a tax cut might be superficially attractive but might leave voters wondering what, if that’s actual reform, all the fuss was about — and why we’re leaving the budget deficit stretching off into the medium term.
And if the poor polling continues, the atmosphere within the government will continue to deteriorate. There’ll be more sniping, the Abbott forces will sniff more blood, and there’ll be more backseat driving from self-appointed policy “ginger groups” on the backbench who see everything through a polling, not a policy, prism.
It all means Turnbull has to take charge, visibly and substantially, assert his authority as Prime Minister — whether a small coterie of reactionaries like it or not — and signal to voters that the Malcolm they were hoping for last year hasn’t vanished. Otherwise, the declining polls might become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If Australia votes for Malcolm and the LNP, fair enough.
If they vote based on a scare campaign about property prices, they deserve the government they will end up with.
Come at us with policies, Malcolm and Bill, leave the scare campaigns behind. They are demeaning, and bullshit.
We’ll have to wait til he’s finished ‘taking the piss’?
Regrettably I am reminded of this:
“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”
Brekky – they done dun it afore, why would they not do so again.
As Darco’s (PT Barnum?) quote suggests, the propensity for people to vote & act against their own best interests is well documented and utilised by every priest, king, emperor and shyster since the Bronze Age.
I’m fed up with the Talcum/rAbbott show. Why isn’t ANYBODY in the media looking at what each side…LNP/ALP…is offering in the POLICY department.
It is becoming boring… everyday we get a) what Abbott did, b) what Talcum didn’t do c) what they should do to win the election. They are not the only players here!
There is now 50% of the voting public who prefer Labor. The preferred PM is a useless number…doesn’t matter how many people ‘prefer’ you, if they are not going to vote for you or your party.
Please, please get back to discussing POLICY in detail.
You could start by telling the readers why Labor’s policy on negative gearing is a good one…nearly all economists agree with it…and why the public should NOT be listening to the Talcum/LNP scare campaign.
That is unless Crikey has become a subtle warrior for the return of this government?? doG help us all!!