A telling statistic illustrates the extent to which the Turnbull government has become a do-nothing government.
Since Tony Abbott’s ouster six months ago, the government has passed 21 bills through Parliament. In the equivalent period over 2014-15, Tony Abbott’s government passed more than 60 bills.
The volume of legislation isn’t necessarily a sound guide to the quality of a government. And some allowance must be made for the fact that, with a change of prime minister and two reshuffles, the ordinary business of government will slow somewhat.
But the fact that the Turnbull government has managed just a fraction of the parliamentary business of the Abbott government says much for the drift and indecisiveness that has characterised the first six months of Malcolm Turnbull’s time as Prime Minister. The Abbott government repeatedly complained of Senate obstructionism, yet it was able to pass legislation at a much higher rate than the current government. Perhaps Turnbull would not be in such a hurry for a double dissolution election if he were achieving the same strike rate as Tony Abbott and his ministers. Or perhaps he simply hasn’t tried.
As we enter the last sitting week before the budget, the focus of the government seems to be on bringing the budget forward and presenting a minimalist tax package designed to give voters a handout ahead of an early election.
This is merely strategising to secure an election win. After that, it seems, the Prime Minister thinks his current problems — a recalcitrant Senate, a fractious backbench, a lack of personal mandate — will disappear.
For the nation’s sake, let’s hope he’s right. Because this isn’t governing, it’s treading water until something comes along.
I’m sure these figures can be Mal adjusted …. sorry, “explained”.
Interesting. I wonder how many bills the Gillard government passed in an equivalent period – I had the impression it was many more than Abbott’s.
Well, getting rid of a blocking Senate is a huge factor in the government being able to pass legislation. What’s the point of putting forward legislation if it is simply going to be voted down and give Senators like Lambie a photo op to grandstand about how good she is?
Well, getting rid of a blocking Senate is a huge factor in the government being able to pass legislation. What’s the point of putting forward legislation if it is simply going to be voted down and give Senators like Lambie a photo op to grandstand about how good she is?
If they were putting through good legislation, they wouldn’t have to worry about it being blocked.
Dictatorships are bad, mmkay.
I can’t think of one bill that was knocked back that wasn’t worth knocking back.
And plenty have gone through that shouldn’t have, such as the security bills, IT track everybody’s everything laws etc.
A bunch of whingers complaining about nothing.
By the way Mr Hand, in the last 30 or more years, the senate has been ‘obstructionist’, apart from Howard’s one term of an absolute majority, which he used to shoot himself in the foot.
The only reason the LNP aren’t laughed out of office is because they don’t get to pass every law they want to.