“We all have feelings of inferiority that become a motivating factor for us to develop skills, talents, and ways of overcoming our sense of inadequacy. Feelings of inferiority can give rise to genius. Unfortunately, they can also give rise to neuroses and problems in daily living when they are overwhelming or when we attempt to hide them rather than face them courageously. Adler believed that courage was the answer to many of the problems of living.” — https://www.alfredadler.org/
Perhaps some innovative, agile political science student should do a thesis on the bushfire-like behaviour of political bungles — how stuff-ups not merely pose a threat in themselves, but they can produce other stuff-ups that suddenly erupt in other areas of a government from a stray spark. In that case, the Turnbull government will furnish plenty of evidence. Yesterday Turnbull managed, with the diligence of a castaway trying to make fire, to turn a tiny, barely flickering flame of an issue — the Adler shotgun — into a roaring bonfire that rapidly consumed his ambitions of making industrial relations his new political centrepiece.
And despite getting the fire under control late yesterday, this morning, spot fires were breaking out well away from the main front as National and Liberal MPs emerged to support the loosening of laws to allow the importation of the Adler shotgun that was fueling the whole thing.
Of course, to continue and labour the metaphor (at least I’m not using shooting imagery), the whole thing was helped by Tony Abbott pouring a generous helping of petrol on things — that’s the Abbott famous for his firefighting, the prime minister who declared the budget emergency was over even if they hadn’t actually done anything because the mere arrival of the fire brigade improved things. Via Twitter — that’s “electronic graffiti” to the uninformed — Abbott, knowing full well guns had already become the issue du jour, decided to proffer his concerns about any relaxation of guns laws, contrary to his own position when prime minister, when he was happy to trade away the Adler shotgun ban to secure Senate wingnut David Leyonhjelm’s vote.
But as we’ve seen over and over again, Abbott’s a “do as I say not as I did” kind of guy on the backbench: whether it’s 18C or spending restraint or Safe Schools or the Malaysian Solution, Tony will lament that you’re not doing the opposite of what he did when in power.
Abbott was merely an opportunist, however; the real problem was Turnbull’s inability to flat-out say that the shotgun ban would remain, preferring instead to repeat that the Howard government’s gun control laws would not be watered down, a piece of lawyerly artifice that didn’t quite do the trick. And, reminded that the fate of the Adler remained in the hands of Commonwealth, state and territory ministers, National Party MPs — they’re often slow on the uptake, that lot — decided to offer their own views. First NSW Deputy Premier Troy Grant, then federal Nationals, even a WA Liberal, the man with golden Rolex, Ian “Not Quite” Goodenough.
Turnbull, desperate to talk about union thuggery and the ABCC bill, must be pulling what’s left of his hair out — especially after Bill Shorten bizarrely gave the Coalition a perfect opportunity to discuss his union links with his support for Labor hack Kimberley Kitching to take Stephen Conroy’s Senate spot. But no, keep the conversation on the idea the Coalition wants to allow more guns into the country, guys, not to mention confirming the narrative that the Prime Minister is hostage to the right within his party.
If nothing else, Turnbull is now clear — if he ever had any doubt, which is unlikely — that Tony Abbott will say anything, exploit any issue, to undermine him, even if it means reversing his own position from when he was prime minister. As Adler suggested, courage is the answer to many of the problems of living, Malcolm. Take courage.
Interesting that journalists swallow and regurgitate the line that not proceeding with a ban on the Adler is “loosening” or “watering down” gun laws. The Adler is legal under the National Firearms Agreement, always has been. The original (Abbott) ban was based on ideology, not facts and no evidence has been presented, anywhere, to suggest that this particular firearm poses any heightened threat to community safety.
‘Malcolm. Take courage.’
Hasn’t got any. Sold it to the devil in his pact to become PM.
Close the door on the way out Malcolm.
A sincere question: why does anyone in Oz require a gun which shoots faster?
Pig shooting is the reason given
A shotgun, with however many shots in the magazine, is not the appropriate weapon for shooting feral pigs.
At close range it most certainly is
‘faster’ is relative, it shoots no faster than any other manual repeating weapon.
Shotguns are short range weapons, used on moving game. They are generally flushed from cover walking up or with gun dogs. You may have multiple shots or multiple targets, thus the use for a repeating weapon.
Any idea that a lever action shotgun is some sort of ‘rapid fire’ weapon is fanciful. It may have been considered rapid in the 19th century; although at the same time, horses were the standard mode of transportation.
But the political point is not how many or how fast – it is that the thing is a higher powered shotgun that the VAST majority of Austrians have no interest in (a) owning (b) using and (c) having pointed at them and being shot with.
BK is spot on that MT made this a problem it never was by his waffle, the second worst waffle in his repertoire (the worst being his insistence on telling the ALP what the content of their policies should be). At least “wing nut” (ta for that Bernard) Leyonhjelm has been flushed out. My best guess is that his longed-for ‘reform’ is now dead courtesy of his own bumbling
… not just Austrians. Australians too 🙂
a) We’re Australians, not Austrians
b) It is now more “higher powered” than any other 12G shotgun. That sort of talk betrays that your position is based on rhetoric
c) Firearms laws are not based on the vast majority of Australians (or Austrians) interest – they are based on providing robust measures to ensure public safety whilst maintaining the amenity of people who have a genuine reason to own a firearm and have been deemed to be fit and proper people
d) Legally owned firearms do not figure in any meaningful way in firearm related crime.
who said “high powered”? Not me! And i don’t care what over-the-topr kill machines are “legal”. get rid of all of them … And Barry … don’t be such a c***t
Thelorikeet you wrote “higher powered” not “high powered” – my apologies, although it is kind of funny that someone who can’t get what country we live in right would be such a pedant 🙂
Abbott is a true gunslinger . . . . shoot first; thinks about it later, if at all!
The Prime Minister dresses like one, thinks like one . . . . and that’s his problem, no-one is taking him seriously!
I am a bit unsure of why you should observe Abbott reversing his own position, that would have to be a skill he learned from Turnbull, the current world champion on backward somersaulting.