Should the decision to grant bail for people charged with crimes, particularly violent offences, be left in the hands of unpaid members of the public?
Bail justices are volunteers appointed to make decisions on bail when a magistrate is unavailable after hours. The bail justices, who only exist in Victoria, mostly attend police stations at night and on weekends and require no “specific qualifications”.
The only requirements are to be over 18 years old, not insolvent, live in Victoria and speak fluent English.
Their role has been thrust into the spotlight after the Bourke Street rampage in Melbourne on Friday, when Dimitrious Gargasoulas is alleged to have killed five people in the CBD after a bail justice granted him bail less than a week earlier, despite police opposition.
On Monday morning, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews announced a series of changes to the bail system in Victoria, along with a wider review into the overall process. Under the changes, bail justices will no longer be used to decide bail for suspects accused of violent crimes.
The review will also be looking at the “conduct of bail applications out of hours, including the role of voluntary bail justices”.
But RMIT associate professor in criminal justice Michael Benes says the state government is unfairly laying the blame on the volunteers, while neglecting to address larger issues.
“Everyone is running around seeing who they can blame, and now they’re looking at bail justices, but that’s bullshit,” Benes told Crikey.
“You need to change the law and make it more difficult for offenders charged with serious violent offences to get bail.”
While the decision by the volunteer to grant Gargasoulas bail come under fire, it would have been nearly impossible for anyone to predict what was to come, and bail justices are far more likely to reject bail, says Emma Colvin of the Centre for Law and Justice at Charles Sturt University .
“My research and previous research has shown that bail justices have a reputation of being quite conservative in their decision-making, and they’ve been highly criticised for this,” Colvin told Crikey.
“The bail justice wouldn’t have been making a decision based on the risk of him doing that particular act in Bourke Street, it would have been based on the charges he was brought in on. Would anyone making that decision have been able to determine that risk?”
While bail justices tend to remand suspects until they can face a more qualified judge, magistrates tend to make more questionable decisions, Benes says.
[How media terrorism speculation nearly hijacked Friday’s attack]
“Reading some of the decisions that magistrates have made on offenders they’ve released on bail, they’re absolutely appalling,” he said.
“Magistrates are the weak point in the system in relation to bail. But rather than blaming the magistrates they’re choosing to blame the volunteers. That’s not going to fix it.”
The bail justice position was introduced through changes to the Bail Act in 1989 as a way to ensure suspects are given the chance to receive a quick decision on bail after hours, especially with cases involving children. There are now about 260 of the volunteers in Victoria, who are rostered by location to respond to police call outs at any hour.
The volunteer positions tend to be taken be older retired men, Colvin says.
“They’re very dedicated people that are very conscious of community service and want to give back to people — they have to be if they’re prepared to get up at night and go to a police station with no financial reward,” she said.
“These people are doing it out of a willingness to volunteer and do something for the community.”
While these volunteers make for easy targets and scapegoats following the immense tragedy of last week, the state government needs to avoid making a knee-jerk decision, she says.
“It’s an absolute tragedy what happened in Bourke Street, but it’s also unprecedented,” Colvin said.
“It’s an anomaly — this is not what people normally do. The majority of people that are bailed aren’t committing serious crimes. If we toughen up the laws to get the anomaly, what’s the impact on all the other people going through that process?”
For Benes, it’s frustrating and heartbreaking to see government after government wait for a tragedy like this before looking to make much-needed reform.
“There have been so many proposals to fix bail but the government has taken no notice of them,” he said.
“The Victorian Law Reform Commission has made a number of recommendations concerning bail a long time ago, and they’ve kept doing it over the past five years. Why does the government wait until something actually happens, for the horror that happened on Friday?
“It is an overreaction to the situation. They have to do something now because they haven’t done anything over the years.”
It is very possible that a professional magistrate would of made the same decision. The biggest barrier to significant change is the Legal Profession itself. The Lindt matter in Sydney demonstrated clearly that they have no capacity for introspection or that their decision making is sometimes simply flawed and out of touch with community standards.
Given that police opposed bail and given the violent nature of his past, it is an odd decision surely. Training should be a part of it, but better yet, where the crime is violent remand them to a magistrate in a fixed time by which time the strength of a case can at least be shown and background information brought forward.
As an ordinary citizen who has had some unfortunate outcomes from our legal system, even though it was admitted I was right, I have nothing but contempt for it. Because that is what it is – a legal system keeping many people employed and richly rewarded, but a justice system it is not. If only, in the case of this young man, there had been another option on his previous interactions with the law – clearly he has had a substance abuse problem and/or mental health problems for some time – he should have been sentenced to time in a rehabilitation facility. But no, governments will not spend money on prevention, either in the legal system or the health system, but vainly hope that by constantly being reactive rather than showing some initiative, and “throwing the book at them” will suffice in spite of all evidence that it will not. Detox centres, emergency mental health clinics – these are the things that will cut crime rates and a lot of heartbreak for those involved. This is more reason why there should be no tax cuts for companies – instead make the bastards pay the tax they owe – then we could afford the kind of preventive options outlined. Citizens somehow have to make ourselves heard and force parliaments to actually represent us.
Too often proved – “Hard cases make bad laws” – and this continues because it is not in the interests of the Establishment to have people happy & content.
Pissed off & afraid, that’s were the votes are as the Drumpfster demonstrated.
Classic example of Politicians: Don’t look there . . . . look over here!
Have known a Bail Justice. He and others provided valuable, committed service on nights you wouldn’t let your dog outside.