Fred Nile would be thrilled with the weather forecast for tomorrow. According to the Bureau of Meteorology, there is a 95% of rain for Sydney, with thunderstorms likely to rain on the annual Mardi Gras parade. For the majority of the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras’ 38-year history, the leader of the Christian Democratic Party Fred Nile has led a prayer for literal rain on the actual parade as a protest against what he sees as the event’s immorality. But although he might be getting a divine favour tomorrow, he does not have such a good strike rate with asking his Saviour to bust out a proverbial flood.
Nile has opposed the march and any progress on gay rights for decades. In a press release before the 2006 parade, Nile begged for God to “forgive Sydney”, saying he was praying for rain over the parade rather than “fire and brimstone”:
“Almighty God the Creator faces two conflicting options — to punish those who deliberately sin and blaspheme, as occurred at Sodom and Gomorrah; or to exercise love, mercy and forgiveness so as to allow time for the Mardi Gras participants to repent of their sin; as Jesus Christ said in his first sermon ‘repent for the kingdom of God is at hand’.”
Nile seems to think that rain, coming at the end of Sydney summer, would force the (usually) scantily clad dancers parading up Oxford Street to abandon the march, and consequently their life of “sin”. But data from the Bureau of Meteorology suggests that Nile’s prayers almost always go unanswered. A total of 26 out of 37 of the dates for the Mardi Gras parade, dating back to the initial protest march in 1978 (before Nile began his prayers), were either rain-free or close to completely dry.
[Political or party? The split in Mardi Gras]
The following are the dates of the parade over the last 38 years (thanks to Matt Akersten from Mardi Gras) and rainfall data taken from the following day from BOM’s station in Centennial Park and Observatory Hill (BOM measures at 9am the following day for the amount of rainfall for the previous day).
The initial protest and the two subsequent parades were held in the middle of winter.
- Saturday, June 24, 1978: 0mm
- Saturday, June 30, 1979: 0mm
- Saturday, June 28, 1980: 0mm
After that, a decision was made to move the parade to summer, as it’s much more fun to get out and protest in very little when it’s a bit warmer.
- Saturday, February 21, 1981: 12.2mm (bit rainy)
- Saturday, February 27, 1982: 0mm (at Observatory Hill)
- Saturday, February 26, 1983: 0mm
- Saturday, February 25, 1984: 0mm
- Saturday, February 23, 1985: 0.6mm
- Saturday, February 22, 1986: 24.5mm (quite rainy)
- Saturday, February 21, 1987: 0mm
- Saturday, February 27, 1988: 0mm
- Saturday, February 18, 1989: 0mm (this year Nile ran a counter protest down Oxford Street in October)
- Saturday, February 17, 1990: 14.4mm (bit rainy)
- Saturday, February 16, 1991: 0.6mm (after 47mm the day before)
- Saturday, February 29, 1992: 0mm
- Saturday, February 27, 1993: 0mm
- Saturday 5 March, 1994: 0mm
- Saturday, March 4, 1995: 18.4mm (quite rainy)
- Saturday, March 2, 1996: 0mm
- Saturday, March 1, 1997: 0mm
- Saturday, February 28, 1998: 0mm
- Saturday, February 21, 1999: 0mm
- Saturday, March 4, 2000: 0mm
- Saturday, March 3, 2001: 7mm (over a four-day period)
- Saturday, March 2, 2002: 0mm
- Saturday, March 1, 2003: 0mm
- Saturday, March 6, 2004: 32.4mm
- Saturday, March 5, 2005: 0mm
- Saturday, March 4, 2006: 0mm
- Saturday, March 3, 2007: 0mm
- Saturday, March 1, 2008: 9.8mm (over two days)
- Saturday, March 7, 2009: 0mm (at Observatory Hill)
- Saturday, February 27, 2010: 0mm
- Saturday, March 5, 2011: 0mm
- Saturday, March 3, 2012: 3.6mm (had been heavier in the days leading up to the parade day, and rain was heavy during the parade)
- Saturday, March 2, 2013: 2.8mm (heavier at 29.5mm the day before)
- Saturday, March 1, 2014: 20mm
- Saturday, March 7, 2015: 0mm
- Saturday, March 6, 2016: No data yet on the BOM website, but it did not rain on that day.
Despite the lack of success both in praying away the gays with rain and failing to block every advance of LGBTI rights in his state throughout his political career, Nile remains undeterred. In 2015, he put out a press release stating that “homosexuality is in opposition to the concept of the natural reproduction of life” and he called on the police to shut the parade down (in lieu of God answering his prayers) because it was “almost naked adults luridly imposing their sexuality to spectating, innocent children” and “indecent exposure”.
So, if we continue this story; Fred will offer his daughters virginity to a pair of dodgy angels, his wife will turn into a pillar of salt and his daughters will then get him drunk and have sex with him in a quiet little cave somewhere. God I love this Yahweh stuff.
Now that you’ve booked your seat in the house of Sodom, mr taylor, and erased your name from the Book of Life, mr taylor. For what? Your support for LGBTI?..no. You have been weighed in the balance and found wanting for spitting in the face of YHWH. Better that you’d never been born.
He did all that by writing an article? My word, I had no idea that God was that strict an online editor.
Bwahahahahahaa! I love you, mr taylor, and want to have your babies.
It’s a shame there’s probably no consciousness after life, for Nile and his ilk could to realise how wasted their lives have been.
“Do as thou wilt” Itsarort, but at least get the story right. Lot offered his virgin daughters to the mob outside his door in exchange for not raping the angels. He did n’t offer his daughters to the angels.
MARLO INAUSTRALIA: In other words his daughters were joyous the angels didn’t get raped, whereas they faced a future of rape and being stoned to death for getting pregnant?
“because it was “almost naked adults luridly imposing their sexuality to spectating, innocent children” and “indecent exposure”.
I am no fan of Fred Nile but I think this is a fair comment. Don’t you Josh?
Parents make a choice to send their kids there.
Yes, of course, and that’s exonerates anyone else from responsibility. Right Josh?
Responsibility for what, Andrew? What harm do you think a march of fun, happy people in great costumes, dancing their hearts out will cause? Climate change? War? Hatred of minorities? Mutations? Gayness by visual contamination? Perhaps you don’t want children to learn that gay people can be out and proud. Perhaps you’d prefer children to suffer shame for a sexual orientation that has never been their choice.
It seems that it is ok for children to watch movies with war and violence in them but not happy people in silly colourful costumes dancing? Someone must be “responsible”!
Are you sure you’ve got your priorities sorted?
Well said Zeke
Careful, don’t take your kids to the beach.
Dunno ’bout Josh but no, exposing children to sexuality is only a problem when they have been so messed up by deluded adults that it would be anything other than normal.
Really Andrew, it is a celebration of life. I lived along the parade route for many years in Paddington, and you know what everybody had fun, and it was always a wonderful atmosphere from the setting up to the morning after parties. To me that type of experience for anyone is a declaration of joy and love. For the people who are so uptight about their sexuality, the problem lies with them and them only. The projection of your fears onto others is sad, but those that are anti-gay in my experience need to reflect on what it is that is really going on for them. This whole using the protection of innocent children, is and old and trusty fall back position for the ‘god botherers’ who wish to keep people caught up in a religious theocracy that takes individual power away from people allowing people like the priests to gain control, with many 1000’s of victims of the paedophile rings of the churches in Australia the has only scratched the surface. As for the bible these stories from a book that was written 300 years after the incidents were supposed to have happened, is a real problem. We also have to keep in mind that Jesus asked all those that had been cast aside by society to come to him, I’m pretty sure LGBTI people would have fitted that group in his time. So Fred again your talking yourself into cul de sac again.