The government is genuinely confused on wage stagnation, pulled in one direction by the hard evidence of the damage it is doing economically (and politically), and pulled in another by its neoliberal instincts. It supports the Fair Work Commission cutting penalty rates. It has slapped real wage cuts on its own public servants. So has the Reserve Bank, mere days after the RBA governor urged workers to demand higher pay rises — just like business thinks pay rises for workers are good — except in their own businesses.
But yesterday’s bizarre announcement by Employment Minister Michaelia Cash that “up to” 10,000 jobs would be created by retailers participating in the clumsily titled “Youth Jobs PaTH (Prepare-Trial-Hire)” program, with retailers getting “up to” (that phrase again) $10,000 a pop if they hire someone after a twelve week “internship”, actively undercuts wages in a sector where they are already under huge pressure from penalty rate cuts. One wonders exactly how complex retail has become that we now need “internships” in that sector.
If this indeed creates 10,000 positions, that’s less than 1% of the retail workforce, well below the quarterly volatility of employment in the sector. But it does mean, for 10,000 lucky retail workers, losing their jobs, or missing out on being hired, because retailers can have an “intern” for twelve weeks and get a handout from the government for doing so.
Remember this is the sector that is enjoying the luxury of being able to cut its workers’ wages with impunity courtesy of the Fair Work Commission’s penalty rate cuts. It’s the sector where franchisees have been found, across a number of companies, to systematically rip off their workers by substantially underpaying them. In particular, underpaying young, vulnerable workers, frequently foreign students who lack the language skills and local knowledge to obtain redress.
And what’s the government doing to address systematic ripping off of workers by franchisees? Well it said it was going to take action, but business has successfully lobbied it to put its bill on hold.
Meantime, business is acting like nothing has changed. James Pearson of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry — a serial offender in this regard — continues to attack the Fair Work Act as too pro-employee, criticises unions and complains to the usual stenographers that business is being victimised for daring to express an opinion.
Business is enjoying record profits, real wages are falling, the industrial relations umpire is cutting the wages of the lowest-paid, the government is encouraging employers to replace paid workers with “interns”, the profit share of national income has never been higher — but business still portrays itself as the victim and professes puzzlement at why the community is so hostile to it.
It’s all more evidence to voters that our economic system has stopped working for them and instead is working only for companies. The political consequences of this have only just begun, and the government is playing with fire by encouraging it.
If it weren’t for rent taking more than 40% of it, our incomes would be quite comfortable. Perhaps the fine print says, pay them more so the dumb shmucks will pay higher rents, or the housing bubble will go pop.
This is the first I’ve heard of this dumb idea. How can a party that is so monumentally stupid attain government?
Elementary dear Nudiefish its the slogan(s) that’s what does it: jobs and growth, growth and jobs, Beel Shortin bad, unions bad, infrastructure jobs and growth; … the s Australian voting sheeples will vote you back into government; they do it everytime.
They attain, & retain, government because the electorate is even more stupid – often it seems intentionally, masochistically, so.
Because we have a monumentally stupid electorate overweighted with Baby Boomers who enjoyed all this country had to offer and then pulled the ladder up after themselves.
Revolution is coming either at the ballot box or in the streets.
What, will you tackle the first pensioner you see coming out of Bingo? That’ll show ’em!
Ah! Michalea,
My very favourite sex object.
On the downside I bet if she had two brains they’d both be lonely.
And amazing! mal Talkbull with no s—eating smirk on his face. Well,that one anyway.
You need help.Fancy even contemplating Cash as a sex object. Crikey
All I can say is thank God, Scrott & Mal for The Wage Fairy?
If we could only have a strong ICAC then at least half of these dorks would be looking for a job in retail. Where do they get these brainless, wide open to abuse ideas from? I used to put it all down to the onion eating mad monk, but they continue to hatch ’em even though he’s said to be a back bencher.
They would not get a job in retail, they are far too incompetent and have zero human relation skills.